[Optimal expansion of the multi-link stent. An in vitro study with high resolution roentgen technique]

It has been speculated that high pressure implantation may improve the results of coronary stenting. However, this method bears the risk of persistent dissection and may increase late lumen loss. Presently, there is no consensus about the optimal stent implantation technique with the regard to balloon size and pressure. To elucidate this question an experimental study was performed in a coronary stenosis model. 3.5 mm Multi-Link (ML) stents were implanted in 3.3 mm silicone rubber tubes containing 50% concentric narrowings. Three implantation techniques were applied: 1. The standard technique using the conventional ML delivery system with a compliant balloon (ML-ST). 2. A new deployment method with a high pressure delivery system (ML-HP). 3. "Focal postdilation" using the ARC catheter, which has a special balloon with an inner compliant and an outer non-compliant section (ML-ARC). For comparison, the Palmaz-Schatz stent was implanted by using a high pressure balloon. Stent expansion was imaged by magnification radiography. Minimal lumen diameter within the stent (MLD) and the lumen diameter outside the stent (BD) were measured after dilations with 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 atm. The relation of the BD to the MLD was used as an index of vessel trauma. The results lead to the following conclusions: 1. A complete apposition to the vessel wall for a balloon/vessel relation of 1.1:1 could not be reached with pressures below 9-15 atm. The increase of the pressure beyond 15 atm resulted only in a minimal additional lumen. 2. Compared to the Palmaz-Schatz stent the recoil of the ML stent was significantly lower. 3. For all three implantation techniques the ML-ARC showed the best results with the maximal dilation of the stenotic vessel-area and the minimal expansion of the vessel outside the stent.