Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clarifying the social support theory-research linkage

J E Hupcey1

  • 1School of Nursing, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey 17033, USA.

Journal of Advanced Nursing
|July 15, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Social support is complex and inconsistently defined, leading to simplistic measurement in research. This analysis reviews definitions, models, and measurement of social support to guide future research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Going it alone: the experiences of spouses of critically ill patients.

Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCN·2002
Same author

The meaning of social support for the critically ill patient.

Intensive & critical care nursing·2002
Same author

An exploration and advancement of the concept of trust.

Journal of advanced nursing·2001
Same author

Childhood farm injuries in Old-Order Amish families.

Journal of pediatric nursing·2001
Same author

Increasing smoking cessation counseling by advanced practice nurses.

Clinical excellence for nurse practitioners : the international journal of NPACE·2001
Same author

The perception of farm safety and prevention issues among the Old Order Amish in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.

Journal of agricultural safety and health·2001

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Health Sciences

Background:

  • Social support is a crucial factor in well-being, yet its complex nature poses challenges.
  • Existing research often lacks theoretical clarity and consistent operational definitions for social support.
  • This ambiguity leads to oversimplified measurement and a fragmented understanding of the concept.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the relationship between theory and research in the field of social support.
  • To categorize existing definitions and explore theoretical conceptualizations of social support.
  • To examine measurement practices in social support research from 1993-1996 and identify future research directions.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and conceptual analysis of social support definitions and theories.
  • Categorization of various social support definitions.
  • Examination of measurement tools and approaches used in empirical studies.

Main Results:

  • Significant heterogeneity exists in the conceptualization and definition of social support.
  • Current research frequently employs simplistic measures, failing to capture the multifaceted nature of social support.
  • A notable gap persists between theoretical frameworks and empirical measurement of social support.

Conclusions:

  • The conceptual ambiguity and measurement simplicity of social support hinder scientific progress.
  • There is a critical need for more rigorous theoretical development and sophisticated measurement strategies.
  • Future research should focus on developing and validating comprehensive models of social support.

Related Experiment Videos