Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cognitive components in perseverative and nonperseverative errors on the object alternation task

F J Bardenhagen1, S C Bowden

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.

Brain and Cognition
|July 17, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Use of the QuickSort with older adults whose lifestyle decision-making capacity is being questioned.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2022
Same author

Effectiveness of sorting tests for detecting cognitive decline in older adults with dementia and other common neurodegenerative disorders: A meta-analysis.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2020
Same author

A comprehensive assessment of cognitive function in the common genetic generalized epilepsy syndromes.

European journal of neurology·2016
Same author

Cognitive functioning in idiopathic generalised epilepsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2014
Same author

Community versus orthopaedic controls in traumatic brain injury research: how comparable are they?

Brain injury·2013
Same author

Is performance on the Wechsler test of adult reading affected by traumatic brain injury?

The British journal of clinical psychology·2007
Same journal

Gelastic dysarthria: Speech-triggered pathological laughter with evidence for a selective pontine gating mechanism.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Effects of Dieting on Neural Encoding of Preferences for Edible and Non-Edible Rewards: An ERP Study.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Structural complexity of brain regions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Spatial navigation training enhances performance on large-scale and small-scale spatial tasks through different neural mechanisms.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Unraveling the link between brain injury and enhanced artistic skills.

Brain and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Alcohol-dependent individuals

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology
  • Addiction research

Background:

  • Object alternation (OA) task performance is often impaired in alcohol dependence.
  • Previous research suggested impaired response inhibition as the primary cause.
  • The role of cognitive rule acquisition in this deficit remained unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of task-specific knowledge acquisition in object alternation (OA) task performance in alcohol-dependent individuals.
  • To differentiate the contributions of rule induction versus response inhibition to task errors.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental manipulation of response rule knowledge in 20 alcohol-dependent men and 20 controls.
  • Assessment of perseverative and nonperseverative errors on the OA task.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the relationship between rule knowledge and error types.
  • Main Results:

    • Perseverative and nonperseverative errors in the OA task are directly controlled by task-specific knowledge.
    • Impaired rule induction, not solely impaired response inhibition, contributes to poor OA task performance in alcohol dependence.
    • Successful response selection and inhibition are contingent upon prior rule induction.

    Conclusions:

    • Cognitive deficits in rule induction significantly impact performance on the object alternation task in alcohol dependence.
    • Findings suggest a need to consider rule induction deficits in clinical assessments of prefrontal function.
    • Implications for understanding performance on other delayed response tasks and tests like the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and Halstead Category Test.