Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy

M L Kasdan1, A L Johnson

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Occupational Medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)
|July 17, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Test-to-PrEP: An Egocentric Approach to Promoting HIV Discussions and Resource Sharing in PrEP Clients' Social Networks.

AIDS and behavior·2025
Same author

Mental health impact of multiple sexually minoritized and gender expansive stressors among LGBTQ+ young adults: a latent class analysis.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2024
Same author

Optimisation of geometric aspect ratio of thin film transistors for low-cost flexible CMOS inverters and its practical implementation.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Superlative use in news articles pertaining to dermatologic therapies: a cross-sectional analysis.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
Same author

Diagnosis and treatment of confirmed and suspected primary hyperparathyroidism in equids: 17 cases (1999-2016).

Equine veterinary journal·2019
Same author

Response of hen pre-recruitment ovarian follicles to follicle stimulating hormone, in vivo.

General and comparative endocrinology·2018
Same journal

Mental health issues: ethical considerations.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Ethics in the locker room: the challenges for team physicians.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Ethical issues in worker productivity.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Protecting posterity: the occupational physician's ethical and legal obligations to pregnant workers.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Genetic testing: ethical implications in the workplace.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Ethical issues in occupational disease outbreak investigations.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
See all related articles

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) diagnosis is highly debated among clinicians. The authors emphasize that objective evidence is crucial for a reliable RSD diagnosis, urging caution against subjective assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Pain Medicine
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), now often termed Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), presents diagnostic challenges.
  • Significant clinician disagreement exists regarding the definition, diagnostic criteria, and phenomenology of RSD.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the controversies surrounding the diagnosis of Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD).
  • To outline prevailing opinions and clinical perspectives on RSD.
  • To advocate for stringent diagnostic standards in RSD evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing studies and clinical guidelines on RSD.
  • Analysis of expert opinions and reported diagnostic challenges.
  • Discussion of the importance of objective findings in clinical practice.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Widespread disagreement persists across all aspects of RSD diagnosis.
  • Current diagnostic approaches often lack objective validation.
  • Subjective interpretations contribute to diagnostic uncertainty.

Conclusions:

  • Diagnosis of RSD requires robust, objective clinical findings.
  • Emphasis on objective evidence is paramount to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce inter-clinician variability.
  • Future diagnostic criteria should prioritize measurable outcomes.