Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Likelihood ratios: getting diagnostic testing into perspective

A Halkin1, J Reichman, M Schwaber

  • 1Department of Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital Mount Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel.

QJM : Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians
|July 17, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Live birth sex ratios and father's geographic origins in Jerusalem, 1964-1976.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2016
Same author

Enteroviral infection in patients treated with rituximab for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a case series and review of the literature.

Hematological oncology·2016
Same author

The use of a standard design medication room to promote medication safety: organizational implications.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2013
Same author

Long-term efficacy of Paula method as compared with pelvic floor muscle training for stress urinary incontinence in women: a 6-month follow-up.

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society·2012
Same author

Concordance between one-hour pad test and subjective assessment of stress incontinence.

Urology·2010
Same author

[Dental management of patients using anti agregant drugs: background, risks and clinical guidelines].

Refu'at ha-peh veha-shinayim (1993)·2010
Same journal

Trends in mortality of people on dialysis in England and Wales over the last 15 years.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2026
Same journal

Familial pulmonary fibrosis due to pathogenic TERT variant presenting with a UIP-PPFE phenotype.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2026
Same journal

Corkscrew Oesophagus Due to Distal Oesophageal Spasm.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Integrated care management for patients following acute stroke: a systematic review.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2026
Same journal

Methodological concerns regarding blinding and long term efficacy of fire needle therapy for plaque psoriasis.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2026
Same journal

Media framing of GLP-1/GIP therapies in Japan: Lessons for aging universal health coverage systems.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2026
See all related articles

Clinical assessment, including patient history and physical examination, is often as powerful as sophisticated tests. Likelihood ratios (LRs) help compare diagnostic test performance to clinical evaluation, improving medical training.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Modern medicine overemphasizes laboratory and imaging tests, potentially neglecting the value of clinical assessment.
  • Ancillary testing can increase patient risk and healthcare costs without always advancing diagnosis.
  • The comparative diagnostic value of clinical evaluation versus technological methods is often underestimated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the performance of frequently used diagnostic tests using likelihood ratios (LRs).
  • To compare the diagnostic power of clinical assessment with that of ancillary tests.
  • To illustrate the application of LRs in clinical cases for diagnostic decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Review of frequently used diagnostic tests by their likelihood ratios (LRs).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of the discriminative power of clinical assessment versus ancillary tests.
  • Use of clinical cases to demonstrate the application of LRs in the diagnostic process.

    • Main Results:

    • The discriminative power of clinical assessment and ancillary tests is often comparable.
    • Combining clinical assessment with ancillary tests significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy.
    • Clinical evaluation is frequently more informative than current technical diagnostic modalities.

    Conclusions:

    • Likelihood ratios (LRs) provide a valuable tool for assessing diagnostic test performance and clinical utility.
    • Medical training should emphasize the evaluation of pre-test probabilities and the application of LRs.
    • Enhancing these skills can help put the value of diagnostic testing into proper perspective.