Another factor besides hydrophobicity can affect signal peptide interaction with signal recognition particle

S Matoba1, D M Ogrydziak

  • 1Institute of Marine Resources, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.

Insights

Yarrowia lipolytica alkaline extracellular protease (AEP) translocation to the endoplasmic reticulum depends on signal peptide properties beyond hydrophobicity. Signal peptide conformation influences the targeting pathway, affecting protein secretion efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Protein Trafficking
  • Yeast Genetics

Background:

  • Protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is crucial for secreted proteins in organisms like Yarrowia lipolytica.
  • The alkaline extracellular protease (AEP) in Y. lipolytica is translocated into the ER via a signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent, cotranslational pathway.
  • A specific mutation, P17M, alters AEP translocation to an SRP-independent, posttranslational pathway.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the factors governing the switch between SRP-dependent and SRP-independent protein translocation pathways.
  • To identify mutations in the AEP signal peptide that alter its translocation mechanism.
  • To understand the role of signal peptide hydrophobicity and conformation in protein targeting to the ER.

Main Methods:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis was used to create mutations in the AEP signal peptide, including P17M and others.
  • Analysis of AEP precursor translocation kinetics and dependence on the signal recognition particle (SRP).
  • Computational modeling to assess the conformation and hydrophobicity of wild-type and mutant signal peptides.

Main Results:

  • Mutations were identified that restored SRP-dependent translocation of the P17M mutant AEP precursor.
  • Some mutations increased signal peptide hydrophobicity, but the A12P/P17M mutation restored SRP dependence without increasing hydrophobicity.
  • Signal peptide models suggest that 'kinked' conformations (wild-type, A12P/P17M) may favor SRP binding more than a 'straight' conformation (P17M).

Conclusions:

  • Signal peptide conformation, in addition to hydrophobicity, plays a critical role in determining the SRP-dependent or SRP-independent translocation pathway.
  • The findings suggest that the orientation of the signal peptide at the ribosomal surface influences SRP interaction and subsequent ER targeting.
  • These observations are particularly relevant for short, low-hydrophobicity signal peptides like that of AEP.

Related Concept Videos

Lipids as Anchors01:32

Lipids as Anchors

In the plasma membrane, the lipids forming the bilayer can also act as an anchor to tether proteins to the membrane. The three main types of lipid anchors found in eukaryotes are – prenyl groups, fatty acyl groups, and glycosylphosphatidylinositol or GPI groups. Prenyl and fatty acyl groups act as anchors on the cytosolic surface of the membrane, whereas GPI anchors proteins on the extracellular side.
The carboxy-terminal of most of the prenylated proteins, such as Ras proteins, contains the...
Signal Sequences and Sorting Receptors01:41

Signal Sequences and Sorting Receptors

Signal sequences are short amino acid sequences that guide newly synthesized proteins to their proper location within the cell. Classical signal sequences are fifteen to sixty amino acids long and present at the N-terminus of a polypeptide chain. Each signal sequence has a conserved segment of basic residues towards their N terminus, a hydrophobic core, and a C-terminus rich in polar residues. The C-terminus also contains a signal cleavage site and features a -3 -1 sequence motif. The -3-1...
Regulation of Nuclear Protein Sorting01:45

Regulation of Nuclear Protein Sorting

Nuclear protein sorting regulates nucleus composition and gene expression, crucial for determining the fate of a eukaryotic cell. Hence, the entry and exit of molecules across the nuclear envelope is a tightly controlled process. Nuclear protein sorting can be inhibited by one of the following ways: 1) masking cargo signal sequences, 2) modifying the nuclear receptor's affinity for cargo, 3) controlling the nuclear pore size, 4) retaining the cargo during its transit to the cytosol or the...
Directing Proteins to the Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum01:34

Directing Proteins to the Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum

The organelle-specific signaling sequences direct proteins synthesized in the cytosol to their final destination like ER, mitochondria, peroxisomes, etc. Some of the proteins directed to ER are then trafficked via vesicles to other organelles within the cell or the extracellular environment through the Golgi complex. For example, the rough ER synthesizes soluble proteins for transportation to the lysosomes or secretion out of the cell. It can also synthesize transmembrane proteins that can...
Insertion of Single-pass Transmembrane Proteins in the RER01:26

Insertion of Single-pass Transmembrane Proteins in the RER

Integral membrane proteins are proteins adhered to the lipid bilayer of a cell organelle or membrane. They can be of two types: transmembrane integral proteins that span the lipid bilayer and monotopic proteins that are attached to either side of the membrane but do not pass through it.
Integral transmembrane proteins possess transmembrane and extra membrane domains. The transmembrane domains are primarily made of 20-25 hydrophobic amino acids arranged in a helical secondary confirmation. These...
Tail-anchoring of Proteins in the ER Membrane01:45

Tail-anchoring of Proteins in the ER Membrane

Tail-anchored, or TA, proteins are estimated to make up to 3-5% of membrane proteins found in the eukaryotic cell. Such proteins have a single transmembrane domain located approximately 30 amino acid residues upstream from the C-terminal end. As a result, the signal recognition particle (SRP) cannot guide a TA protein to the ER membrane for cotranslational insertion. Hence, they are integrated into the ER membrane post-translationally using their C-terminal end as the anchor. TA proteins...