Related Experiment Videos
Functional evaluation using motor scores after cervical spinal cord injuries
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hakone National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Spinal Cord
|July 22, 1998
Summary
Zancolli's classification accurately assesses cervical cord injuries in Frankel grades A and B. For Frankel grade C patients, the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score is more helpful for evaluating self-care abilities.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Spinal Cord Injury Research
Background:
- Zancolli's classification is effective for Frankel grades A and B cervical cord injuries.
- It is limited in assessing Frankel grade C patients, who also have mobility impairments.
- A need exists to evaluate functional status in Frankel grade C patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare Zancolli's classification with the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor scores.
- To evaluate self-care abilities in Frankel grade C patients with cervical cord injuries.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of Zancolli's classification and ASIA motor scores.
- Assessment of self-care functions including urinary toileting and wheelchair mobility.
- Focus on patients with Frankel grade C cervical spinal cord injuries.
Main Results:
- Zancolli's classification showed a close correlation with the ASIA motor score in Frankel grade C patients.
- Self-care thresholds for urinary toileting and wheelchair mobility were identified.
- ASIA motor score of approximately 30 points correlated with self-care ability in Frankel grade C patients.
Conclusions:
- The ASIA motor score is a valuable tool for assessing functional motor status in Frankel grade C patients.
- This score aids in defining the capabilities for self-care in this patient group.
- The findings support the utility of the ASIA motor score for guiding rehabilitation strategies.