Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Epidemiology: second-rate science?

M Parascandola1

  • 1DeWitt Stetten, Jr., Museum of Medical Research, National Institutes of Health Historical Office, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. mparas@erols.com

Public Health Reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
|December 16, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Criteria for evaluating tobacco control research funding programs and their application to models that include financial support from the tobacco industry.

Tobacco control·2009
Same author

Hazardous effects of tobacco industry funding.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2003
Same author

Objectivity and the neutral expert.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2002
Same author

Science and law. Cell phone lawsuits face a scientific test.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2001
Same author

Causation in epidemiology.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2001
Same author

Cigarettes and the US Public Health Service in the 1950s.

American journal of public health·2001
Same journal

Experiential and Structural Determinants of Communicable Disease Reporting Among Health Care Providers in Alameda County, California.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2026
Same journal

A Case-Case Study of Sporadic and Outbreak-Associated Listeriosis Exposures: <i>Listeria</i> Initiative Food History Data, 2016-2022.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2026
Same journal

Developing a Prioritization Method for Imported Infectious Diseases Using National Notifiable Surveillance Data: The Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games Experience.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2026
Same journal

Reduction in Hepatitis C Virus RNA Positivity Among Clients in an Inpatient Substance Use Treatment Program in New York City.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2026
Same journal

Managing Institutional Change Through Participatory Planning: Creating the College of Integrated Health Sciences at the University at Albany, State University of New York.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2026
Same journal

An Urgent Need for Evidence-Based Guidance on Mercury Exposure Screening to Inform Public Health Policy, Practice, and Prevention.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2026
See all related articles

Epidemiology faces criticism for being unscientific, but this study argues that inductive inference is crucial for causal claims in all empirical sciences, including public health. The tobacco industry has exploited this skepticism regarding evidence linking cigarettes and lung cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • Epidemiology is increasingly criticized as "unscientific" in public and regulatory spheres.
  • The tobacco industry has historically challenged epidemiological evidence linking cigarettes to lung cancer.
  • Many epidemiologists exhibit skepticism regarding the validity of causal claims derived from their field.

Observation:

  • A prevalent belief posits that only laboratory science can provide definitive proof.
  • This view incorrectly assumes laboratory research lacks uncertainty or inductive inference.
  • Epidemiological evidence is often mischaracterized as merely "circumstantial."

Findings:

  • The historical roots of this skepticism trace back to influential thinkers like John Stuart Mill and Claude Bernard.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The debate surrounding cigarettes and lung cancer serves as a case study for examining scientific proof.
  • Inductive inference from limited samples to broader populations is fundamental to all empirical science.

    • Implications:

    • Re-evaluating the scientific rigor of epidemiology is essential for public health.
    • Understanding inductive inference strengthens the scientific basis of epidemiological findings.
    • Challenging the dichotomy between laboratory and observational science is critical for scientific progress.