Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating alternating pressure overlays

K S Gebhardt1, J Hookway, J M Bland

  • 1Department of Public Health Sciences, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London.

Journal of Wound Care
|July 25, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letters.

Journal of wound care·2016
Same author

Letters.

Journal of wound care·2016
Same author

The impact of assertive outreach teams on hospital admissions for psychosis: a time series analysis.

Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing·2015
Same author

Holter monitoring of small breed dogs with advanced myxomatous mitral valve disease with and without a history of syncope.

Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2014
Same author

In defence of logarithmic transformations.

Statistics in medicine·2013
Same author

AESOPS: a randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic screening and stepped care interventions for older hazardous alcohol users in primary care.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2013

This study found most alternating pressure overlays experienced mechanical failures and mismanagement. Despite performance differences, unreliability is a significant issue for these medical devices.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Device Technology
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Alternating pressure overlays are crucial for preventing pressure ulcers in healthcare settings.
  • Ensuring the reliable performance and proper management of these devices is essential for patient care.
  • Previous research has highlighted the need for evaluating device durability and user error.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the mechanical reliability and management of 53 alternating pressure overlays over one year.
  • To identify common causes of malfunction and physical damage.
  • To compare the performance and repair times across different types of overlays.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving daily examination of 53 alternating pressure overlays for mechanical malfunction and mismanagement.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Categorization of malfunction reasons and recording of physical damage.
  • Analysis of performance differences and repair durations among six overlay types.

    • Main Results:

    • 69 mechanical failures and 7 cases of physical damage were recorded during the study period.
    • Significant variations in performance and repair times were observed between different overlay types.
    • 56 management errors, primarily related to power supply, and 5 design-related mismanagement issues were identified.

    Conclusions:

    • Mechanical unreliability is a persistent problem across most alternating pressure overlays, despite some performing better than others.
    • User error and design flaws contribute significantly to device mismanagement.
    • Further improvements in design and user training are needed to enhance the reliability of alternating pressure overlays.