Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Structure-based methods for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity: are we there yet?

A M Richard1

  • 1MD-68, Environmental Carcinogenesis Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA. richard.ann@epamail.epa.gov

Mutation Research
|August 1, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Accurate chemical toxicity prediction using structure alone is challenging due to biological complexity. Commercial systems, while varied, offer statistical or rule-based approaches for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity prediction.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

COSMOS next generation - A public knowledge base leveraging chemical and biological data to support the regulatory assessment of chemicals.

Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2021
Same author

An automated curation procedure for addressing chemical errors and inconsistencies in public datasets used in QSAR modelling.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2016
Same author

Understanding genetic toxicity through data mining: the process of building knowledge by integrating multiple genetic toxicity databases.

Toxicology mechanisms and methods·2009
Same author

Predictive models for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: frameworks, state-of-the-art, and perspectives.

Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews·2009
Same author

Use of structure-activity relationships for probing biochemical mechanisms: glutathione transferase zeta conjugation of haloacids.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2002
Same author

An evaluation of the mutagenicity, metabolism, and DNA adduct formation of 5-nitrobenzo[b]naphtho[2,1-d]thiophene.

Chemical research in toxicology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Cheminformatics

Background:

  • Commercial automated programs for predicting chemical mutagenicity and carcinogenicity based on structure are of significant interest.
  • Accurate and reliable toxicity prediction solely from chemical structure remains an elusive goal.
  • Toxicity prediction is limited by the need to generalize within specific chemical domains governed by similar biological mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance and highlight the differences between commercial toxicity prediction systems.
  • To assess the applicability of structure-based prediction for a specific class of chemicals, haloacetic acids (HAs).
  • To discuss methods for evaluating prediction system performance and the role of prospective studies.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of two main categories of commercial systems: statistical (structure-activity relationship) and knowledge-based (expert systems).
  • Application of four commercial systems (TOPKAT, CASE/MULTI-CASE, DEREK, OncoLogic) to predict mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of haloacetic acids.
  • Consideration of prospective prediction exercises and alternative approaches like database exploration.

Main Results:

  • Commercial systems differ in their methods of representing, processing, and generalizing chemical-biological activity data.
  • The study highlights the practical differences in applying these systems to a specific chemical class.
  • Gauging the relative performance of these prediction systems is crucial for reliable toxicity assessment.

Conclusions:

  • The fundamental biological complexity limits the universal accuracy of structure-based toxicity prediction.
  • Understanding the distinct approaches of commercial systems is key to their appropriate application.
  • Further research into prospective prediction and database exploration may offer complementary insights.