Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How well does the Chemiclave sterilize handpieces?

R A Kolstad1

  • 1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas 75246, USA.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)
|August 1, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The emergence of load-oriented sterilization.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·1994
Same author

OSHA without tears. Part two: Developing an exposure control plan.

Texas dental journal·1992
Same author

The option "none of these" improves multiple-choice test items.

Journal of dental education·1991
Same author

Failure of the STER-O-LIZER MD 200 to pass the EPA sporicidal test.

Compendium (Newtown, Pa.)·1990
Same author

Rapid dry heat sterilization.

Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO·1988
Same author

Format selection in machine-scored classroom achievement tests.

Journal of dental education·1985

Chemical vapor effectively sterilizes dental handpieces, but steam sterilization shows limitations in penetrating internal handpiece sites. Further research is needed to address steam

Area of Science:

  • * Healthcare Sterilization Technology
  • * Infection Control in Dentistry

Background:

  • * Dental handpieces require effective sterilization to prevent cross-contamination.
  • * Traditional sterilization methods like steam autoclaving have known limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To evaluate the efficacy of chemical vapor sterilization versus steam sterilization for dental handpieces.
  • * To assess the penetration capability of both sterilization methods into internal handpiece components.

Main Methods:

  • * Utilized the Food and Drug Administration's protocol for testing healthcare sterilizers.
  • * Inoculated six high-speed and one low-speed dental handpiece models with Bacillus stearothermophilus spores.
  • * Conducted half-cycle challenges using chemical vapor (Chemiclave) and steam (autoclave) sterilizers.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • * Chemical vapor demonstrated excellent lethality against Bacillus stearothermophilus spores.
  • * Steam sterilization exhibited penetration weaknesses, particularly in enclosed internal handpiece sites.
  • * Bacillus stearothermophilus spores were effectively inactivated when openly exposed to both methods.

Conclusions:

  • * Chemical vapor sterilization is a highly effective method for dental handpieces.
  • * Steam sterilization may require further optimization to ensure complete penetration and sterilization of internal handpiece components.
  • * The findings highlight the importance of considering sterilant penetration in dental instrument reprocessing.