[Rotatory impulse test does not replace caloric tests]

We sought to determine whether the rotatory impulsional test was capable of exploring the canalar function with sufficient precision to replace the caloric test, as it has been recently affirmed. We first compared the observed preponderance from this test with that measured during a sinusoidal (20 and 4 s) test. We observed that, in the case of a significant preponderance for a given test, there was complete redondance with the preponderance observed with any other test. The rotatory impulsional test does not present any specific advantage compared to other kinetic test as far as the observation of the preponderance phenomenon. We then compared the preponderance with the results of the caloric tests and came to the following conclusions i) the absence of preponderance does not allow us to predict the absence of vestibular deficit, due to the fact that 37% of the deficits were compensated for including acoustic neuroma; ii) the presence of a preponderance does not allow a priori to say whether it is of vestibular, cervical, or central origin and systematic caloric tests shows that almost one fourth of preponderance observed is not associated with unilateral weakness iii) supposing that a clinical argument allow us to conclude as to the probable vestibular origin of a vestibular preponderance, the direction of this preponderance does not allow us to determine which side is involved. In fact, if the undercompensated deficits are 3 times more frequent than overcompensated deficits, the proportion of preponderance not linked to a significant deficit indicates that the probability of encountering a preponderance related to a specific undercompensated deficit is approximately 50%. We thus did not find in the rotatory impulsional test any specific advantage allowing us to predict the laterality of a vestibular lesion.