Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Aortic valve surgery following previous coronary artery bypass grafting. Impact of calcification and leaflet movement
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center of North-Rhine-Westfalia, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Insights
Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement after coronary artery bypass grafting often have rapidly progressing aortic valve disease. Early signs like calcification or impaired motion suggest considering aortic valve replacement during initial coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Valvular Heart Disease
Background:
- Aortic valve replacement (AVR) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) carries high mortality.
- Rapid progression of aortic valve disease is a concern in these patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the progression of aortic valve disease in patients who underwent AVR after prior CABG.
- To identify predictors of rapid aortic valve disease progression in this patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 27 patients undergoing AVR post-CABG.
- Analysis of cardiac catheterization data, including aortic valve pressure gradients.
- Assessment of aortic valve calcification and leaflet motion from pre-AVR cardiac catheterization films.
Main Results:
- Aortic valve disease, primarily aortic stenosis, progressed rapidly between CABG and AVR (mean interval 4.6 years).
- Aortic valve peak-to-peak pressure gradient increased significantly from 20.2 mmHg to 63.0 mmHg.
- High incidence of aortic valve calcification (81.5%) and impaired leaflet motion (81.5%) was observed at the time of CABG.
Conclusions:
- Aortic valve disease progression is rapid in patients requiring AVR after CABG.
- Pre-existing aortic valve calcification or impaired motion at the time of CABG may indicate a high risk for rapid progression.
- Consider AVR during CABG not only based on hemodynamic criteria but also if aortic valve calcification or impaired motion is present.
Abstract:
We reviewed the reports of 27 patients who had an aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting. The aortic valve disease -- mainly aortic stenosis -- showed a rapid rate of progression. In the time interval between coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement of 4.6+/-2.2 years the peak-to-peak pressure gradient of the aortic valve rose from 20.2+/-14.3 to 63.0+/-22.7 mmHg. As there is a great interest to identify the patients with a high risk of a rapid progression because of a high mortality of an aortic valve replacement as the second cardiac operation following a coronary artery bypass grafting we also reviewed the cardiac catheterisation films and found a high incidence of calcification and impaired aortic valve motion (81.5% of the patients had already calcified aortic valves and 81.5% had a impaired valve motion) at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting. We concluded that if a patient has to be operated for coronary artery disease an aortic valve replacement should be considered not only according to hemodynamic criteria but also when the aortic valve is calcified or its leaflets' motion is impaired.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management

