Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evolution from endoscopic to miniinvasive facelift: a logical progression?

A F del Campo, C B Gordon, O K Bergman

    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
    |August 4, 1998
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A global mission.

    Aesthetic surgery journal·2009
    Same author

    Umbilical transposition in TRAM flap: a simple horizontal translocation.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
    Same author

    Regional dermolipectomy as treatment for sequelae of massive weight loss.

    World journal of surgery·1998
    Same author

    Liposuction: procedure for focal volume reduction and body contour remodeling.

    World journal of surgery·1998
    Same author

    The endo-facelift. Basics and options.

    Clinics in plastic surgery·1997
    Same author

    Heat shock protein expression in human placenta and umbilical cord.

    Shock (Augusta, Ga.)·1996
    Same journal

    Comparison of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty and Dorsal Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Body Image as a Mediating Mechanism in the Association Between Media Literacy and Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Among Young Adults.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Evolution of Facial Assessment in Aesthetic Medicine: 3D Imaging, Digital Analysis, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
    Same journal

    From Etiology to Aesthetic Surgery: Mapping Knowledge Domains and Emerging Trends in Gynecomastia Research: 35-Year Bibliometric Analysis.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Prophylactic Local Antibiotic Therapy in Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Distinct Molecular Signature of Earlobe Keloids: Integrated Transcriptomic Analysis of Extracellualr Matrix, Metalloproteinase, and Metabolic Pathways.

    Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
    See all related articles

    A new mini-invasive facelift technique offers results comparable to endoscopic facelifts with less swelling and shorter surgery times. This approach also avoids preauricular scars in most patients, enhancing cosmetic surgery outcomes.

    Area of Science:

    • Plastic Surgery
    • Aesthetic Surgery
    • Minimally Invasive Procedures

    Background:

    • Endoscopic techniques have advanced aesthetic surgery through minimal incisions.
    • Subperiosteal lifting, derived from craniofacial surgery, forms the basis for these procedures.
    • Challenges with endoscopic instrumentation and technique have prompted alternative approaches.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate a non-endoscopic, mini-invasive subperiosteal facelift technique.
    • To compare its efficacy and patient outcomes against endoscopic rhytidectomy.
    • To assess the feasibility of avoiding preauricular scars with this modified approach.

    Main Methods:

    • A cohort of 63 patients underwent a mini-invasive subperiosteal facelift.
    • The procedure was performed without endoscopic assistance.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Outcomes were assessed over a follow-up period of up to 4 years.

    • Main Results:

    • The mini-invasive facelift yielded results equivalent to endoscopic rhytidectomies in selected patients.
    • This approach demonstrated reduced morbidity, edema, and operative time.
    • Preauricular scar avoidance was achieved in 84% of the cases.

    Conclusions:

    • A non-endoscopic, mini-invasive subperiosteal facelift is a viable alternative to endoscopic techniques.
    • It offers comparable aesthetic results with improved patient recovery and reduced scarring.
    • This technique is suitable for appropriate patients seeking facial rejuvenation.