Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

A Protocol for Analyzing Hepatitis C Virus Replication
Published on: June 26, 2014
A comparative evaluation of the sensitivity of five anti-hepatitis C virus immunoblot assays
A M Couroucé1, L Noel, F Barin
1Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine, Paris, France.
Background And Objectives:
In order to compare sensitivity, five anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) immunoblot assays were tested (Deciscan plus, Inno-Lia III, Matrix, Murex Western blot and RIBA-3).
Materials And Methods:
The test panel (50 samples for each assay) included 6 anti-HCV-negative samples and 44 samples from 36 HCV-infected subjects.
Results:
There were minor differences in core reactivity among the assays. The smallest number of NS3-reactive results occurred with the Murex and Matrix assays, and the smallest number of NS4 reactives with RIBA-3 and Matrix. Among the 20 discrepant results for NS5 there was one clear false-negative with Inno-Lia. Only 28 of the 50 samples of the panel gave the same results in all the assays: 5 negatives and 23 positives. One of the 6 negative samples were indeterminate in 3 assays. Eighteen of the 21 other divergent results were interpreted as either indeterminate or positive, a common reactivity being exhibited by all 5 assays. The most important discrepancies occurred on 3 HCV-RNA-positive samples which came up negative in some assays: 2 samples with isolated NS3 reactivity were negative by Matrix and Murex Western blot, 1 of them being also negative by Inno-Lia III; another sample was negative by RIBA-3 and Matrix due to weak signals (< 1) on core and NS3 proteins, which did not exceed 1+ with the other assays.
Conclusions:
With more uniform criteria for interpretation, the results would have been less divergent. Some assays should improve their sensitivity to the NS3 protein.

