Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Acetabular reconstruction using acetabular reinforcement rings]

M Starker, F Kandziora, A Jäger

    Der Orthopade
    |August 11, 1998
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    ASO Author Reflections: Beyond Treatment Intensity: Understanding Individual Susceptibility in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL).

    Annals of surgical oncology·2026
    Same author

    Palbociclib exposure in relation to efficacy and toxicity in patients with advanced breast cancer.

    ESMO open·2025
    Same author

    Implementation of model-informed precision dosing for tamoxifen therapy in patients with breast cancer: A prospective intervention study.

    Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2025
    Same author

    Long-term follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, phase III, multi-centre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of field-directed photodynamic therapy (PDT) of mild to moderate actinic keratosis using BF-200 ALA versus placebo and the BF-RhodoLED® lamp.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2024
    Same author

    Single- and Multilevel Corpectomy and Vertebral body replacement for treatment of spinal infections. A retrospective single-center study of 100 cases.

    Brain & spine·2024
    Same author

    Histopathological concordance between prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens-implications of transrectal and transperineal biopsy approaches.

    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2023
    Same journal

    [Fast-track hip and knee joint arthroplasty].

    Der Orthopade·2022
    Same journal

    [Outpatient care through cross-sector prehabilitation and rehabilitation concepts in outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty].

    Der Orthopade·2022
    Same journal

    [Preoperative management in fast-track arthroplasty].

    Der Orthopade·2022
    Same journal

    [Perioperative management in fast-track arthroplasty].

    Der Orthopade·2022
    Same journal

    [Pain therapy and anaesthesiological procedures in fast-track arthroplasty].

    Der Orthopade·2022
    Same journal

    [Discharge readiness versus discharge-Results of the PROMISE study].

    Der Orthopade·2022
    See all related articles

    Revision hip arthroplasty using acetabular reinforcement rings demonstrates favorable outcomes, comparable to primary implants. This study evaluated 174 cases, showing a low loosening rate of 3.4% after an average of 5.6 years.

    Area of Science:

    • Orthopedic Surgery
    • Biomaterials Engineering

    Background:

    • Revision hip arthroplasty addresses complex acetabular defects.
    • Acetabular reinforcement rings are crucial for implant stability.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the efficacy of acetabular reinforcement rings in revision hip arthroplasty.
    • To compare outcomes of different ring types and assess a novel ring design.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective analysis of 174 revision hip arthroplasties using various acetabular reinforcement rings (Müller, Ganz, Burch-Schneider, RS/RSH, custom implants).
    • Average follow-up of 5.6 years.
    • Radiological and clinical assessment of component loosening, center of rotation reconstruction, and bone graft incorporation.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Low rate of radiological or clinical loosening (3.4%) observed in 174 acetabular components.
    • The novel ring design offers improved fixation and cost-effectiveness compared to custom implants.
    • Successful reconstruction of the center of rotation and bone integration was noted.

    Conclusions:

    • Acetabular reinforcement rings provide durable fixation in revision hip arthroplasty.
    • The developed ring is a viable alternative for managing massive acetabular defects.
    • A scoring system aids in evaluating surgical success in revision hip procedures.