Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
An optimal inflow procedure for multi-segmental occlusive arterial disease: ilio-femoral versus aorto-bifemoral
G Zukauskas1, H Ulevicius, E Janusauskas
1Department of Surgery, Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Hawaii, Kuwait.
Insights
For chronic critical limb ischemia requiring multi-segmental reconstruction, unilateral ilio-femoral bypass offers outcomes comparable to aorto-bifemoral bypass, with reduced perioperative risks. Extra-anatomical bypasses demonstrate lower effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Arterial Disease Management
Background:
- Chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a significant challenge in vascular surgery, often stemming from multi-segmental arterial disease.
- While aorto-iliac artery correction suffices for many, 10-15% require multi-segmental reconstructions, necessitating optimal inflow procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To retrospectively compare perioperative and long-term outcomes of different inflow procedures for multi-segmental lower limb revascularization.
- The study evaluated aorto-bifemoral bypass, unilateral ilio-femoral bypass, and extra-anatomical bypass.
Main Methods:
- A 10-year retrospective analysis (1984-1994) of 449 multi-segmental aorto-femoro-popliteal/tibial reconstructions for occlusive arterial disease.
- Procedures included aorto-bifemoral (131 cases), unilateral ilio-femoral (288 cases), and extra-anatomical bypass (30 cases).
Main Results:
- Postoperative mortality was lowest in the unilateral ilio-femoral group (1.3%) compared to aorto-bifemoral (3.8%) and extra-anatomical (3.3%) bypasses.
- Five-year primary graft patency rates were 90.9% (aorto-bifemoral), 88.5% (unilateral ilio-femoral), and 66.7% (extra-anatomical).
- Secondary patency rates at 5 years were 94.7%, 93.4%, and 77.3% for the respective groups.
Conclusions:
- Unilateral ilio-femoral bypass is a highly effective inflow procedure for multi-level occlusive arterial disease, matching aorto-bifemoral bypass efficacy with improved safety.
- Extra-anatomical bypasses are less effective for these complex cases.
Unlabelled:
Treatment of chronic critical limb ischemia still remains one of the most serious problems of vascular surgery. Most often, chronic critical limb ischemia is caused by multi-segmental disease of arterial tree, involving both the aorto-femoral and infrainguinal vessels. In the majority of these cases, proper correction of aorto-iliac arteries is sufficient to restore the circulation in lower limbs. However, in 10-15% it is necessary to perform multi-segmental reconstructions. In these cases it is extremely important to choose the optimal inflow procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare perioperative and long-term results of multi-segmental reconstructions, using aorto-bifemoral, unilateral ilio-femoral, and extra-anatomical bypass as inflow procedures. During the 10-year period (1984-1994), 4074 aorto-femoral reconstructions were performed for treatment of occlusive arterial disease. In 449 cases (11%), multi-segmental aorto-femoro-popliteal/tibial reconstructions were undertaken. Aorto-bifemoral bypasses was performed in 131, unilateral ilio-femoral bypasses in 288, and extra-anatomical bypasses in 30 cases. In 221 cases, the operations were performed in one stage, and in 228 cases a two-stage procedure took place. Postoperative mortality was 3.8% in the aorto-bifemoral bypass group, 1.3% in the unilateral ilio-femoral group, and 3.3% in the extra-anatomical group. Primary inflow graft patency rate after 12 months was 94.7% in the aorto-bifemoral bypass group, 94.1% in the unilateral ilio-femoral group, and 80% in the extra-anatomical group. Secondary inflow graft patency rate was 97.8% in the aorto-bifemoral bypass group, 96.2% in unilateral ilio-femoral group, and 96.7% in extra-anatomical group. The 5-year primary and secondary graft patency rates were 90.9% and 94.7% in the aorto-bifemoral bypass group, 88.5% and 93.4% in the unilateral ilio-femoral group, and 66.7% and 77.3% in the extra-anatomical group, respectively.
Conclusion:
Unilateral ilio-femoral bypass as an inflow procedure for treatment of multilevel occlusive arterial disease is as effective as aorto-bifemoral bypass, with lower perioperative mortality and morbidity rates. Extra-anatomical bypasses are, however, less effective.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
09:38Minimally Invasive Isolated Limb Perfusion (MI-ILP) for Locally Advanced Melanomas and Sarcomas of the Extremity
Published on: January 31, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Arteries of Lower Limbs
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care