Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual search has no memory

T S Horowitz1, J M Wolfe

  • 1Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Center for Ophthalmic Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. toddh@search.bwh.harvard.edu

Nature
|August 26, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparable prediction of breast cancer risk from a glimpse or a first impression of a mammogram.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2021
Same author

Dating phototrophic microbial lineages with reticulate gene histories.

Geobiology·2018
Same author

Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

The Effect of Early Postnatal Injection of Testosterone Propionate on the Structure of the Anterior Hypophysis of Male and Female Rats.

The Yale journal of biology and medicine·2011
Same author

A fourth cell type in the anterior hypophysis of the dog.

The Anatomical record·2010
Same author

A cytological study of the anterior hypophysis of the dog with particular reference to the presence of a fourth cell type.

The Anatomical record·2010
Same journal

Six ways to put the public at the heart of science and policy.

Nature·2026
Same journal

The complex truth about trust in science.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Have people stopped trusting science? The data tell a surprising story.

Nature·2026
Same journal

How FAIR data are helping to build trust in science.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Scientists should recognize their own political biases to build public trust.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Harmonizing standards and resources for the medical genome.

Nature·2026
See all related articles

Common sense suggests visual search involves tracking items, but this study shows otherwise. Search efficiency for a target letter remained unchanged even when the visual display was constantly shuffled, challenging existing theories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Human visual search involves directing attention sequentially.
  • It is commonly assumed that rejected items are tracked to avoid redundant search.
  • Existing theories posit that search efficiency depends on accumulating object identity information over time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether visual search efficiency is impaired by continuous scene shuffling.
  • To challenge the assumption that visual search relies on tracking attended and rejected items.
  • To test the predictions of standard visual search theories under dynamic conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Human observers searched for a target letter ('T') among distractor letters ('L').
  • A critical condition involved randomly relocating all letters every 111 milliseconds, preventing tracking.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Search efficiency was measured by the time taken per item.

    • Main Results:

    • Search efficiency for the target letter remained unchanged despite the continuous scene shuffling.
    • The inability to track item progress did not impair search performance.
    • This finding contradicts predictions from standard visual search theories.

    Conclusions:

    • Standard theories of visual search, which assume information accumulation over time, require revision.
    • Visual search may not rely on tracking individual items as previously believed.
    • Attention deployment in visual search may operate differently under dynamic conditions.