Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Screening fundamentals

R A Smith1

  • 1Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Optimizing breast cancer screening requires age-specific mammography intervals and high participation. Effective screening programs detect smaller tumors and fewer positive lymph nodes for better treatment outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Synthesis and characterization of thiobutyltriphenylphosphonium bromide, a novel thiol reagent targeted to the mitochondrial matrix.

Archives of biochemistry and biophysics·1995
Same author

The current status of the Papanicolaou smear.

CA: a cancer journal for clinicians·1995
Same author

Screening women aged 40-49 years: where are we today?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·1995
Same author

Continuous thermodilution cardiac output: agreement with Fick and bolus thermodilution methods.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·1995
Same author

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of ventricularly administered superoxide dismutase in monkeys and preliminary clinical observations in familial ALS.

Journal of the neurological sciences·1995
Same author

Activation of complement by DMSO and ethanol and its inhibition by soluble complement receptor type 1.

Biochemical Society transactions·1995
Same journal

Impact of WHO Classification of Tumours on cancer prevention, diagnosis, research, public health, and economics.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs·2026
Same journal

Cancer epigenetics: unraveling etiology and mechanisms to advance prevention.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs·2026
Same journal

Oncogenic infections: targets highly amenable to cancer prevention.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs·2026
Same journal

The continuing importance of the IARC's international remit in cancer research.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs·2026
Same journal

Environmental and occupational cancer: highlighting research contributions from the IARC on its 60th anniversary.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs·2026
Same journal

Progress in identifying the preventable causes of human cancer: the experience of the IARC Monographs program.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Mammography screening for breast cancer is established, but optimal age-specific guidelines and intervals remain debated.
  • Varying opinions exist on when breast cancer screening should commence and at what frequency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a detailed, age-specific evaluation of mammography screening.
  • To assess breast cancer severity, treatment effectiveness based on detection timing, and mammography accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from previous randomized trials and other relevant sources.
  • Evaluation of screening program effectiveness based on sensitivity, specificity, and participation rates.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Screening programs require high participation, 85% sensitivity, and 90% specificity.
  • Age-specific screening intervals and consideration of disease stage are crucial for diagnosis.
  • Benchmarks include detecting >50% of cancers <15 mm, >30% of grade 3 cancers <15 mm, and >70% node-negative cancers.

    • Conclusions:

    • Effective breast cancer screening necessitates age-specific strategies and high adherence.
    • Program evaluation should incorporate tumor size, grade, and nodal status at detection.
    • Optimized screening protocols can improve early detection and treatment outcomes.