Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of three RT-PCR methods

L N Sellner1, G R Turbett

  • 1Department of Pathology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA 6000, Australia.

Biotechniques
|August 26, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Forensic intelligence in Australia and New Zealand: Status and future directions.

Forensic science international·2024
Same author

The use of an alternative light source to detect semen in clinical forensic medical practice.

Journal of clinical forensic medicine·2006
Same author

Segmental isodisomy and skewed X-inactivation resulting in haemophilia B in a female.

British journal of haematology·2005
Same author

Recovery of DNA for forensic analysis from lip cosmetics.

Journal of forensic sciences·2001
Same author

Allelic loss of cyclophilin 40, an estrogen receptor-associated immunophilin, in breast carcinomas.

Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology·2001
Same author

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma of papillary origin. A case report and cytogenic evaluation.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2000
Same journal

Investigating the interactomic landscape of survival motor neuron (SMN) and the SMNΔ7 truncated protein.

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Antigen retrieval-immunofluorescence on free floating sections to visualize the liver lobule and its cellular makeup.

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Special approach of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for transgene stability of a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line.

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Strand-specific quantification of L1 ORF0 and related transcripts by multiplex reverse transcription with tagged primers.

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Why and when should we choose digital PCR?

BioTechniques·2026
Same journal

Quantitative and unbiased lung alveolar septum assessment in an LPS experimental mouse model using 2D-spatial correlation image analysis from hematoxylin and eosin slides.

BioTechniques·2026
See all related articles

Comparing RNA amplification methods, continuous two-enzyme reverse transcription (RT)-PCR is most sensitive. This method offers reduced handling and contamination risk compared to uncoupled RT-PCR.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • RNA transcript amplification is crucial for molecular biology applications.
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is a key technique for DNA amplification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the sensitivity and efficiency of different RNA transcript amplification methods.
  • To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of coupled versus uncoupled RT-PCR techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated three reverse transcription (RT)-PCR methods: uncoupled, continuous single-enzyme, and continuous two-enzyme.
  • Assessed sensitivity, labor intensity, and contamination risk for each method.

Main Results:

  • Continuous two-enzyme RT-PCR demonstrated the highest sensitivity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Uncoupled RT-PCR was less sensitive than continuous methods.
  • Continuous methods reduced sample handling and contamination potential.

    • Conclusions:

    • The continuous two-enzyme RT-PCR is the most sensitive approach for RNA amplification.
    • Continuous RT-PCR methods offer practical benefits in terms of reduced labor and contamination.
    • Single-enzyme continuous RT-PCR, while more expensive, allows for higher temperature reverse transcription.