Effects of cues on memory in alcoholics and controls

This study was conducted to determine whether alcoholics' memory difficulties are due, in part, to access (retrieval) or to availability (retention) deficits. Forty-four alcoholics (n = 20 females) and 44 controls (n = 22 females) learned a paired associate list consisting of 12 adjective-CCC trigram pairs. Half of the subjects in each group learned the list to a low degree of learning (DOL; 4/12 pairs); the remainder to a high DOL (8/12 pairs). Two distinct environmental contexts (providing implicit cues) were used during acquisition. Subjects then completed a cued recall (an explicit cue) test in either the same or a different room. Alcoholics were significantly inferior in the acquisition phase on trials required to reach criterion, regardless of DOL required [F(1,68) = 10.92, p = 0.002]. The main effect for implicit cuing was not significant; similarly, there were no significant interactions. In contrast, the explicit cue manipulation produced a significant group x DOL interaction on the number of trigrams correctly recalled [F = (1,77) = 6.38, p = 0.01]; alcoholics' recall did not benefit from the higher DOL in contrast to a significant improvement in recall by controls. The failure of alcoholics to demonstrate improvement with higher levels of learning is consistent with a deficit in the availability of information. The results confirm previous reports of recovering alcoholics' verbal learning and memory dysfunction, and suggest that these deficits may be attributed, in part, to a deficit in the availability of information (retention).