Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developmental differences in rule learning: a microgenetic analysis

R S Siegler1, Z Chen

  • 1Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Cognitive Psychology
|September 8, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term benefits of seeding the knowledge base.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Across the great divide: bridging the gap between understanding of toddlers' and older children's thinking.

Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development·2002
Same author

Seeds aren't anchors.

Memory & cognition·2001
Same author

Buy low, sell high: the development of an informal theory of economics.

Child development·2000
Same author

The rebirth of children's learning.

Child development·2000
Same author

Explanation and generalization in young children's strategy learning.

Child development·1999

This study examined how young children learn balance scale rules. Older children learned better due to their existing knowledge and skills, which aided in understanding and applying new rules.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Development
  • Child Psychology
  • Learning Sciences

Background:

  • Understanding how children learn complex rules is crucial for educational strategies.
  • Previous research has focused on either initial child knowledge or learning processes, but not both simultaneously.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interplay of distal (prior knowledge) and proximal (learning processes) variables in rule acquisition.
  • To identify developmental differences in how 4- and 5-year-olds learn balance scale problem-solving rules.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a microgenetic design with trial-by-trial strategy assessments.
  • Examined rule learning in 4- and 5-year-olds using balance scale problems.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Developmental differences in learning were linked to age-correlated distal variables: initial rule use and encoding.
  • Older children's advanced initial knowledge facilitated proximal processes like noticing key variables and rule generalization.

Conclusions:

  • Both initial child characteristics (distal) and in-the-moment learning actions (proximal) are vital for understanding cognitive development.
  • A combined approach is essential for a comprehensive view of learning and development in children.