Related Experiment Videos

The effect of different growth hormone administration frequencies on growth in growth hormone-deficient patients

L Cavallo1, F De Luca, S Bernasconi

  • 1Department of Biomedicine of Developing Age, University of Bari, Italy.

Hormone Research
|September 8, 1998
PubMed

Insights

Continuous subcutaneous growth hormone administration via pump did not improve growth velocity in children with growth hormone deficiency compared to daily injections. A 3 times/week schedule also showed no negative growth effects.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Endocrinology
  • Growth Hormone Therapy
  • Metabolic Disorders

Background:

  • Children with isolated growth hormone deficiency often require long-term treatment.
  • Optimizing growth hormone administration methods is crucial for treatment efficacy.
  • Previous studies established the efficacy of daily subcutaneous growth hormone injections.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if pump-administered continuous and intermittent subcutaneous growth hormone improves growth in prepubertal children.
  • To assess the impact of a 3 times/week growth hormone treatment schedule on growth compared to 6 injections/week.

Main Methods:

  • Two studies were conducted in prepubertal children (bone age ≤8 years) with isolated growth hormone deficit.
  • Study A compared pump administration (continuous + intermittent) with single daily injections over 6 months each.
  • Study B compared a 3 times/week treatment schedule with a 6 times/week schedule.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in IGF-I levels, growth velocity, or bone age advancement were observed between pump and daily injection methods (Study A).
  • No negative effects on auxological parameters were found when growth hormone was administered 3 times/week versus 6 times/week (Study B).

Conclusions:

  • Combining continuous and intermittent subcutaneous growth hormone administration via pump does not enhance growth velocity over daily injections.
  • Administering growth hormone 3 times/week, particularly from the third year of therapy, appears safe and does not negatively impact growth compared to 6 injections/week.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos