Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy: STOP-DUB

A M Weber1, M G Munro

  • 1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA.

Medscape Women'S Health
|September 10, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) treatments like endometrial ablation and hysterectomy are compared in the STOP-DUB trial. Results will guide women and doctors on the best surgical options for DUB.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of a core outcome set and outcome definitions for studies on uterus-sparing treatments of adenomyosis (COSAR): an international multistakeholder-modified Delphi consensus study.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2022
Same author

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of Venous Vessels in Neonates with Perinatal Asphyxia.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2021
Same author

Adverse events during nursing care procedure in intensive care unit: The PREVENIR study.

Intensive & critical care nursing·2020
Same author

Quantitative Analysis of Punctate White Matter Lesions in Neonates Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping and R2* Relaxation.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2019
Same author

Research and clinical management for women with abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: More than PALM-COEIN.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2016
Same author

Leiomyosarcoma and myomectomy: is the cat ever in the bag?

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2016
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) often leads to hysterectomy.
  • Endometrial ablation is a less invasive alternative but may not always resolve symptoms.
  • Long-term effectiveness of endometrial ablation compared to hysterectomy requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare endometrial ablation and hysterectomy for treating DUB.
  • To evaluate patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life and symptom resolution.
  • To assess subsequent surgery rates and cost-effectiveness.

Main Methods:

  • The Surgical Treatments Outcomes Project for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (STOP-DUB) is a randomized trial.
  • 800 women with DUB will be randomized to either endometrial ablation or hysterectomy.
  • Participants will be followed for 2 years post-surgery, with a parallel observational study for non-surgical candidates.

Main Results:

  • Data collection is ongoing; results are pending.
  • The study aims to provide comprehensive data on the comparative effectiveness and patient experience of both procedures.
  • Preliminary observations suggest potential long-term disadvantages of endometrial ablation may offset short-term benefits.

Conclusions:

  • The STOP-DUB trial will offer crucial evidence for informed decision-making regarding DUB surgical treatments.
  • Findings will empower patients and healthcare providers to weigh the benefits and risks of endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy.
  • This research is expected to significantly impact clinical practice guidelines for managing DUB.

Related Experiment Videos