Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Recovered memory therapy: a dubious practice technique

J T Stocks1

  • 1School of Social Work, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1118, USA. stocks@pilot.msu.edu

Social Work
|September 18, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reporting the proportions of variance explained (PVE)

The American journal of psychiatry·1987
Same journal

Labor Trafficking of Immigrant Children: Gaps in the Social Work Literature.

Social work·2026
Same journal

Promoting Prison Reform through Collaborative Research: A Case Study in Chile.

Social work·2026
Same journal

The Role of Professional Mission in Buffering Secondary Traumatization.

Social work·2026
Same journal

The OET Autism Framework: Rethinking Clinical Practice with Adolescent and Adult Autistic Females.

Social work·2026
Same journal

Is There Room for Social Justice in Clinical Supervision? A Systematic Literature Review.

Social work·2026
Same journal

Tracing Job Quality and Equity in the Social Work Profession.

Social work·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Recovered memory therapy for childhood sexual abuse shows no proven benefits and may be harmful. Both true and false memories can be recovered, with no reliable way to distinguish them.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Psychiatry
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Therapeutic interventions often focus on recovering repressed memories of childhood sexual abuse.
  • The efficacy and validity of these memory recovery techniques are debated within the scientific community.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the validity of memory work techniques.
  • To assess the evidence for the efficacy of therapeutic interventions based on recovered childhood sexual abuse memories.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on memory work.
  • Analysis of empirical evidence regarding recovered memory therapy outcomes.
  • Examination of treatment outcome research.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evidence indicates that both true and false memories can be recovered through memory work.
  • No reliable methods exist to differentiate between true and false recovered memories.
  • There is a lack of empirical evidence supporting improved client outcomes from recovered memory therapy.

    • Conclusions:

    • Recovered memory therapy lacks empirical support for efficacy.
    • Participation in recovered memory therapy may pose risks and potential harm to clients.
    • Further research is needed to understand the complex nature of memory and trauma treatment.