Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Volume conduction effects in EEG and MEG

S P van den Broek1, F Reinders, M Donderwinkel

  • 1Biomagnetic Centre, Faculty of Applied Physics, Low Temperature Division, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
|September 19, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First Measurement of Time-Dependent CP Violation in the Flavor-Changing Neutral-Current Decay B^{0}→K_{S}^{0}μ^{+}μ^{-}.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Measurement of the Top-Quark Production Cross Section and Charge Asymmetry at LHCb.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Searches for B^{0}→K^{+}π^{-}τ^{+}τ^{-} and B_{s}^{0}→K^{+}K^{-}τ^{+}τ^{-} Decays.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Evidence of the B_{s}^{0}→K^{-}π^{+}γ Decay.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Precision Measurement of CP Violation and Branching Fractions in B^{±}→K_{S}^{0}h^{±} (h=π, K) Decays and Search for the Rare Decay B_{c}^{±}→K_{S}^{0}K^{±}.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Observation of the B[over ¯]_{s}^{0}→Λ_{c}^{+}Λ[over ¯]_{c}^{-} Decay and Evidence for the B[over ¯]^{0}→Λ_{c}^{+}Λ[over ¯]_{c}^{-} Decay.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coming to terms with brain waves.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2014
Same journal

Habituation of lower leg stretch responses in Parkinson's disease.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Asymmetry of cortical excitability revealed by transcranial stimulation in a patient with focal motor epilepsy and cortical myoclonus.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Evoked isometric muscle contractions in myopathies: analysis of pathophysiological properties by different stimulus patterns.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Task-related coherence and task-related spectral power changes during sequential finger movements.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Electrophysiological studies in mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
See all related articles

Skull defects significantly impact electroencephalography (EEG) localization accuracy, causing errors up to 15 mm. However, these skull anomalies minimally affect magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Standard volume conductor models for electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) often simplify skull anatomy.
  • These models typically neglect critical features such as skull defects, lesions, ventricles, and anisotropic skull conductivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of neglected anatomical features on EEG and MEG signal modeling.
  • To assess the impact of these features on source localization accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Finite element method (FEM) simulations were employed to model the head's electrical properties.
  • Simulations incorporated variations in skull integrity, including holes and lesions, as well as ventricular presence and anisotropic conductivity.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Skull defects were found to significantly affect EEG, leading to potential localization errors exceeding 15 mm, while having a negligible impact on MEG.
  • Lesions can alter EEG and MEG signal characteristics, necessitating their inclusion in models when neural sources are nearby, to prevent localization failures.
  • Ventricles require inclusion in models primarily when neural sources are in close proximity or when ventricles are unusually large; anisotropic skull conductivity primarily smears EEG signals.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate volume conductor models for EEG and MEG must account for anatomical variations like skull defects and lesions for reliable source localization.
  • The specific impact of anatomical features varies between EEG and MEG, highlighting the need for tailored modeling approaches.