Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2026

The Evoked Potential Operant Conditioning System (EPOCS): A Research Tool and an Emerging Therapy for Chronic Neuromuscular Disorders
Published on: August 25, 2022
Three years of experience with prospective randomized effectiveness studies
A Hillis1, M H Rajab, C E Baisden
1Scott and White Memorial Hospital and Scott, Sherwood and Brindley Foundation, Temple, Texas, USA.
Developing prospective randomized effectiveness studies is feasible in multi-practice settings. This methodology allows for reliable treatment outcome assessment with long-term follow-up of comparison groups.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Comparative Effectiveness Research
Background:
- Establishing effective methodologies for prospective randomized effectiveness studies is crucial for advancing evidence-based healthcare.
- Existing observational studies often lack long-term follow-up and direct comparison groups, limiting their reliability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a methodology for conducting prospective randomized effectiveness studies within a multi-practice academic medical center setting.
- To establish an operational framework, the effectiveness registry, for designing and supporting comparative practice improvement studies.
Main Methods:
- A demonstration project was implemented across a multispecialty practice, health maintenance organization, and hospital.
- An effectiveness registry was created to manage study design and data collection, modeled after tumor registry procedures.
- Studies involved long-term follow-up of randomized comparison groups, with limited physician data collection and no additional tests beyond clinical care.
Main Results:
- Fourteen trials were approved by the institutional review board (IRB) between October 1993 and April 1997.
- Patient randomization acceptance rate was 74% (596/804), with over 800 patients enrolled in 10 studies.
- Initial findings from two studies have been accepted for publication in major peer-reviewed journals.
Conclusions:
- Prospective randomized effectiveness studies are feasible in multi-practice settings, offering reliable assessment of treatment outcomes.
- The developed methodology, utilizing an effectiveness registry, supports long-term follow-up and comparison of care improvements.
- Collaborative multi-institutional arrangements are recommended to enhance sample sizes for greater statistical power.
Related Concept Videos
What is an Experiment?
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs