Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Antepartum testing

D A Miller1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, LAC & USC Women's and Children's Hospital 91105, USA.

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
|September 22, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Antepartum fetal testing, including nonstress tests (NST) and biophysical profiles (BPP), is safe and effective. These tests significantly reduce fetal death rates in high-risk pregnancies, potentially warranting routine use in all pregnancies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Large-scale single-molecule analysis of tau proteoforms.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Cadmium phytoextraction by Helianthus annuus (sunflower), Brassica napus cv Wichita (rapeseed), and Chyrsopogon zizanioides (vetiver).

Chemosphere·2020
Same author

A Multicenter Pilot Study on the Clinical Utility of Computational Modeling for Flow-Diverter Treatment Planning.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2019
Same author

Demographic and mortality analysis of hospitalized children at a referral hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

BMC pediatrics·2016
Same author

Prenatal diagnosis of intraventricular hemorrhage in a fetus with congenital diaphragmatic hernia using magnetic resonance imaging.

Minerva ginecologica·2015
Same author

Psychiatry clerkship sites : factors that make a difference in student performance.

Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry·2014
Same journal

Obstetric Care for Patients With Cognitive Disabilities.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Dissecting the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Requirements when Approaching Obstetric Patients With Disabilities: How to Ensure Your Spaces are Accessible for All.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Clinician Comfort and Barriers to the Obstetric and Gynecologic Care of Patients With Disabilities.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Obstetric Care for Patients With Visual Impairments: Preconception Counseling Through Postpartum Care.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Menstrual Management and Contraception for Patients With Disabilities.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Favoring Elective Hospitalization in Pregnancies With Vasa Previa.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Obstetrics
  • Fetal Monitoring

Background:

  • Antepartum testing is crucial for high-risk pregnancies.
  • Current methods include nonprovocative tests (NST, BPP, MBPP) and contraction stress tests (CST).
  • Outpatient CST use is limited by IV access needs and risk of uterine hyperstimulation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of various antepartum fetal testing methods.
  • To assess the impact of antepartum testing on fetal death rates.
  • To explore future directions in fetal monitoring for high-risk pregnancies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of large studies on antepartum testing methods.
  • Comparison of nonprovocative tests (NST, BPP, MBPP) with contraction stress tests (CST).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of adjunctive methods like fetal movement counting and Doppler velocimetry.
  • Main Results:

    • Nonprovocative antepartum tests are safe and effective in ambulatory settings.
    • Antepartum testing significantly lowers fetal death rates compared to untested populations.
    • Tested high-risk pregnancies have a lower fetal death rate than low-risk, untested pregnancies.

    Conclusions:

    • Antepartum testing is highly beneficial, particularly for high-risk pregnancies.
    • The effectiveness of current methods may lead to considering routine antepartum testing for all pregnancies.
    • Future protocols may combine standard and adjunctive tests to further reduce fetal mortality.