[Long-term follow-up of patients with small St. Jude aortic valve prostheses]

Thirty-five patients received small sized 19 or 21 mm valves (group I) and 53 patients received 23 or 25 mm valves (group II). At follow-up a significant reduction in the left ventricular mass was found for both patient groups (p < 0.0001). The patients in group I had higher peak pressure gradients than did those in group II. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups, or any significant correlation between peak pressure gradients and body surface area. Actuarial survival was 84.7% at 15 years for group I and 85.9% at 17 years for group II. Actuarial freedom from valve-related events was 91.4% at 15 years for group I and 82.7% at 17 years for group II. There was no significant difference in survival or valve-related event free curves between the two groups. After implantation of small SIM valves, significant left ventricular mass regression was obtained and the results were comparable to those for valves of other sizes. The long-term performance of aortic valve replacement with small valves was satisfactory as judged by improvement in the functional class of patients, survival statistics, the durability of the prosthesis, and valve related morbidity comparable to that of valves of other sizes.