Related Experiment Videos

Permeable FGF-1 nuclear localization signal peptide stimulates DNA synthesis in various cell types but is

A Komi1, M Suzuki, T Imamura

  • 1Biosignaling Department, National Institute of Bioscience and Human Technology, 1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8566, Japan.

Experimental Cell Research
|September 23, 1998
PubMed

Insights

A peptide containing a nuclear localization signal (NLS) partially induces DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression in various cells. However, it does not cause cell division and is insufficient for mitosis.

Area of Science:

  • Cell Biology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • A previously identified 26-amino-acid peptide (SA), containing the nuclear localization signal (NLS) of fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF-1) and a membrane-permeable sequence, was shown to stimulate DNA synthesis in NIH3T3 fibroblasts.
  • The mechanism by which SA influences cellular processes, particularly cell cycle progression and mitosis, requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the ability of the SA peptide to induce DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression in different cell types.
  • To compare the effects of SA with those of FGF-1 on cellular processes.
  • To determine if SA can induce cell division or interfere with FGF-1-stimulated proliferation.

Main Methods:

  • Treatment of BALB/c3T3 murine fibroblasts, human vascular endothelial (HUVE) cells, and primary cultured hepatocytes with the SA peptide.
  • Assessment of DNA synthesis and G1 cyclin expression kinetics.
  • Evaluation of SA's effect on cell division and FGF-1-stimulated proliferation.
  • Utilizing a mutant SA peptide with a destroyed NLS motif as a control.

Main Results:

  • The SA peptide, but not its NLS-mutant, induced DNA synthesis in BALB/c3T3, HUVE, and primary hepatocytes, albeit with weaker activity than FGF-1.
  • SA-induced DNA synthesis and G1 cyclin expression kinetics mirrored those of FGF-1, indicating cell cycle progression.
  • SA induced only a fraction of the DNA replication in BALB/c3T3 cells and its effects were more sensitive to contact inhibition than FGF-1.
  • SA did not induce cell division in HUVE and BALB/c3T3 cells and did not impede FGF-1-stimulated HUVE cell proliferation.

Conclusions:

  • SA partially induces cell cycle progression via a contact-inhibition sensitive pathway.
  • SA is insufficient to support cell mitosis.
  • SA-mediated signaling does not interfere with FGF-1 signaling.

Related Concept Videos