[How is transference assessed? Evaluation of the 290th session from the clinical perspective]

In modern view, the transference process is both repetition and change. To grasp specific relationship patterns systematically different content-analytical methods are used in the context of singles case studies. FRAMES, BIP (PERT) and CCRT, as demonstrated in the foregoing articles by Hölzer, Herold, Deserno et al. place various accents: expressed emotions, interpersonal experience, and the central relational conflict. They do not lead only to a concentrated reconstruction of the respective situational dynamics obtained according to known rules; they also seem to be able to confirm the clinical experience that repetition and change meet in the patient-analyst relationship.