Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain (PPOP)
Published on: January 27, 2010
[Evaluation of acute pain in prehospital medicine]
A Ricard-Hibon1, N Leroy, M Magne
1Smur Beaujon, service d'anesthésie-réanimation, hôpital Beaujon, France.
Insights
Acute pain is common in prehospital emergency care, with pain scales like the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) proving effective for assessment. However, pain management remains inadequate, necessitating improved treatment protocols.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Pain Management
- Clinical Assessment
Background:
- Acute pain is a frequent and significant issue in the prehospital setting.
- Effective assessment of pain intensity is crucial for appropriate patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prevalence and management of acute pain in prehospital emergency medicine.
- To assess the utility of pain scales (VRS and VAS) in this context.
- To identify inadequacies in pain treatment.
Main Methods:
- A prospective survey was conducted over three months.
- Eligible adult patients were assessed using the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
- Pain intensity, patient demand for analgesia, and relief obtained were recorded at the beginning and end of medical management.
Main Results:
- Of 255 patients, 42% reported pain via VRS, and 60% could use VAS.
- VRS and VAS scores showed significant correlation (P < 0.001).
- Despite significant pain (VAS >= 30 mm), only 31% requested analgesia, and 64% received it; pain improved but remained high, with only 49% reporting good relief.
Conclusions:
- Acute pain is prevalent in prehospital care, and validated scales like VRS and VAS are useful for its assessment.
- Current pain management in this setting is frequently inadequate.
- There is a critical need to develop and implement improved pain treatment protocols, potentially including opioids, to address these inadequacies.
Objective:
To evaluate acute pain in prehospital setting.
Study Design:
Prospective survey.
Patients:
All eligible patients during a 3-month-period, excepted children less than 10-year-old.
Method:
Pain intensity was evaluated by verbal rating scale with 5 points (VRS), visual analog scale (VAS), demand for antalgics by the patient and the relief obtained. These data were collected at the beginning (T0) and the end (Tend) of medical management. Analgesic treatments were let at the physician's choice.
Results:
A series of 255 patients were included (mean age 58 +/- 1.5 SEM, sex-ratio 57M/43F). Among them, 42% experienced pain at VRS. VAS could be used in 60% of patients. VRS evaluated by the patient was correlated to the VAS (P < 0.001). Among those with significant pain (defined by a VAS > or = 30 mm), only 31% asked for analgesia and 64% received analgesics. Pain scales (VRS and VAS) were significantly improved (P < 0.001) at the end of the medical management, except for patients who did not receive any treatment. However, mean VAS was still above 30 mm, even in patients receiving analgesics. Only 49% of patients expressed a good relief at the end of the medical management.
Conclusion:
Acute pain is frequently observed in prehospital emergency medicine. Pain scales such as VRS and VAS are used easily and convenient for the assessment of pain intensity in this context. However, even if pain is correctly evaluated, it is still inadequately treated. The reasons of these inadequacies must be assessed and corrected with pain treatment protocols including opioids.
More Related Videos
09:38Determining Pain Detection and Tolerance Thresholds Using an Integrated, Multi-Modal Pain Task Battery
Published on: April 14, 2016
06:04Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Analgesia and Pain Management
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Inflammation III: Local and Systemic Effects