Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

New tricks for an old assay

R Clay

    Environmental Health Perspectives
    |October 2, 1998
    PubMed
    Summary

    Traditional guinea pig tests for human contact allergens are limited by animal use and subjective, masked results. Researchers have sought alternative methods since the 1980s to improve accuracy and reduce animal testing for allergen identification.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Radioclinical correlations in carotid arteriography].

    Revue medicale de France·2014
    Same author

    EU sewers still not up to standard.

    Environmental health perspectives·2002
    Same author

    Total chemical synthesis of human activin beta(A)[12-116] and related large-loop polypeptides.

    Biopolymers·2002
    Same author

    Innovations: saving the Earth from space.

    Environmental health perspectives·2001
    Same author

    Adipose tissue metabolism in benign symmetric lipomatosis.

    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2001
    Same author

    Cold war, hot nukes: legacy of an era.

    Environmental health perspectives·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Toxicology
    • Dermatology
    • Allergen Testing

    Background:

    • Guinea pig tests have historically identified human contact allergens in products.
    • These methods involve subjective visual assessment of skin redness.
    • Limitations include significant animal use and potential masking of results by chemical colorants.

    Discussion:

    • The subjectivity of visual assessment hinders precise allergen quantification.
    • The inability to discern redness in colored substances compromises test validity.
    • Ethical concerns and scientific limitations drive the search for alternatives.

    Key Insights:

    • Alternative testing strategies are crucial for advancing allergen identification.
    • Reducing reliance on animal models is a key objective in toxicological research.
    • Developing objective, reliable methods is essential for consumer and workplace safety.

    Outlook:

    • Future research focuses on developing in vitro and in silico models.
    • Advancements aim to provide more accurate and reproducible allergen detection.
    • The goal is to replace or significantly reduce animal testing in allergenicity assessments.

    Related Experiment Videos