Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Alternatives to spinal fusion

J P Kostuik1

  • 1Professor and Chief, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

The Orthopedic Clinics of North America
|October 3, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Analysis of the risk factors for the development of post-operative spinal epidural haematoma.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2005
Same author

Cauda equina syndrome in ankylosing spondylitis (the CES-AS syndrome): meta-analysis of outcomes after medical and surgical treatments.

Journal of spinal disorders·2001
Same author

Anterior spinal cord injury with preserved neurogenic 'motor' evoked potentials.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2001
Same author

Does intraoperative fluid management in spine surgery predict intensive care unit length of stay?

Journal of clinical anesthesia·2001
Same author

The effect of neuromuscular blockade on pedicle screw stimulation thresholds.

Spine·2000
Same author

Spine update: antimicrobial prophylaxis in spine surgery: basic principles and recent advances.

Spine·2000

Advancements in spinal surgery, including less invasive techniques and internal fixation, have improved outcomes. However, significant spinal fusion failures necessitate exploring alternative surgical treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Spine Surgery
  • Orthopedic Technology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Minimally invasive surgical techniques for disc excision and spinal fusion have evolved significantly.
  • Development of rigid internal fixation devices with multiple fixation points represents a major technological advancement.
  • Enhanced understanding of spinal fusion biology has contributed to improved surgical approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of technological advancements on spinal fusion success rates.
  • To identify persistent challenges and limitations in current spinal fusion procedures.
  • To highlight the need for alternative surgical strategies due to high failure rates.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent literature on spinal fusion techniques and outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of technological innovations in spinal instrumentation.
  • Examination of biological factors influencing spinal fusion healing.

    • Main Results:

    • Despite technological improvements, significant failure rates persist, particularly in spinal fusions.
    • Current fixation devices and biological knowledge have not fully eliminated fusion complications.
    • The incidence of spinal fusion failure remains a critical concern in orthopedic surgery.

    Conclusions:

    • Current surgical techniques, while advanced, are associated with substantial spinal fusion failures.
    • There is a clear need for the development and investigation of alternative surgical treatments for spinal fusion.
    • Further research into novel approaches is essential to improve long-term spinal fusion outcomes.