Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Composite technology in load-bearing orthopaedic implants

S L Evans1, P J Gregson

  • 1Engineering Materials, University of Southamptom, UK.

Biomaterials
|October 3, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hierarchical biomechanical characterisation of riboflavin-UVA crosslinking and decorin treatment in the porcine cornea.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2025
Same author

MRI data sharing in psychosis: Key challenges and a new Open Access resource for researchers.

Schizophrenia research·2025
Same author

Rapid, non-invasive, <i>in vivo</i> measurement of tissue mechanical properties using gravitational loading and a nonlinear virtual fields method.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2023
Same author

MRI safety, imaging artefacts, and grid distortion evaluated for FFP3 respiratory masks worn throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

Clinical radiology·2022
Same author

Review of decontamination protocols for shared non-critical objects in 35 policies of UK NHS acute care organizations.

The Journal of hospital infection·2021
Same author

Evening preference correlates with regional brain volumes in the anterior occipital lobe.

Chronobiology international·2021
Same journal

Remodeling TME via feedback-driven photothermal-ferroptosis-immune cascade.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Photodynamic therapy produces enhanced efficacy of antitumor immunotherapy by simultaneously inducing intratumoral release of sorafenib" [Biomaterials 2020, 240, 119845].

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Mg-integrated octopus-inspired hydrogel dressing enables autonomous adhesion and wound closure for enhanced healing via sequential microenvironment regulation.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Engineering miRNA-223 nanocomplexes via bioorthogonal self-assembly for precision therapy of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Enhanced fluorescence imaging guided photodynamic therapy of sinoporphyrin sodium loaded graphene oxide" [Biomaterials 42 (2015) 16442].

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

An injectable Ce-MnCo LDH nanozyme gel with cascade catalytic activity for acute radiation proctitis in rats.

Biomaterials·2026
See all related articles

Composite biomaterials offer novel orthopaedic design possibilities but face significant challenges in fabrication, testing, and predicting long-term performance. Overcoming these hurdles is crucial for their successful clinical integration.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopaedic Engineering
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Composite materials are promising for orthopaedic applications but have limited commercial success.
  • Challenges exist in composite design, fabrication, and testing for orthopaedic use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review composite biomaterials, fabrication methods, and design considerations for orthopaedics.
  • To highlight challenges in testing and predicting long-term performance of orthopaedic composites.
  • To discuss the complex biological interactions of composite materials.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on composite biomaterials for orthopaedics.
  • Analysis of fabrication techniques and their impact on component design.
  • Examination of testing methodologies and standards for composite materials.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of biological interactions and long-term mechanical performance prediction.

    • Main Results:

    • Composite materials offer extensive design freedom but require a clear understanding of objectives and constraints.
    • Existing testing standards for monolithic materials are inadequate for composites.
    • Predicting long-term mechanical performance and understanding biological interactions remain significant challenges.

    Conclusions:

    • Despite considerable challenges in design, fabrication, testing, and performance prediction, composite materials hold significant potential for future orthopaedic advancements.