Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Limitations in using international occupational disease statistics for comparative analysis]

J A Indulski1, Z Starzyński

  • 1Zakładu Epidemiologii Srodowiskowej Instytutu Medycyny Pracy im. Lodzi.

Medycyna Pracy
|October 7, 1998
PubMed
Summary

International occupational disease statistics are difficult to compare due to varying definitions. Efforts by organizations like the WHO and ILO aim to standardize data collection and diagnostic procedures for better global health insights.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

["Occupational medicine": summing up of the achievements and prospects of development in the 50th anniversary of the journal].

Medycyna pracy·2000
Same author

Metabolic genotype in relation to individual susceptibility to environmental carcinogens.

International archives of occupational and environmental health·2000
Same author

Medical causes of female sickness absence during economic transition in Poland.

International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health·2000
Same author

The biomarkers detecting early changes in the human organism exposed to occupational carcinogens.

Central European journal of public health·2000
Same author

Ischaemic heart disease as an effect of obesity-related metabolic disturbances.

Central European journal of public health·1999
Same author

Occupational health education in Poland: new needs, new requirements, new programmes.

International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health·1999

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Occupational Medicine
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • International statistical data on occupational disease incidence lacks comparability.
  • Existing data often includes work-related diseases under the umbrella of occupational diseases, leading to inconsistencies.
  • This heterogeneity hinders cross-national comparative studies and accurate global health assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the challenges in comparing international occupational disease statistics.
  • To identify the primary reasons for the lack of comparability in published data.
  • To highlight initiatives aimed at standardizing occupational disease data.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of international publications on occupational disease incidence.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Case studies from selected countries illustrating definitional discrepancies.
  • Review of actions taken by international health organizations.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant variations in the definition of 'occupational disease' across countries were identified.
    • These definitional differences, particularly the inclusion of work-related diseases, impede direct data comparison.
    • Examples demonstrate how these inconsistencies render data unsuitable for comparative analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • The lack of standardized definitions for occupational diseases is a major barrier to international comparability.
    • International organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO), International Labour Organization (ILO), and European Union (EU) are actively working towards unification.
    • Standardizing diagnostic procedures and data collection/publication systems is crucial for reliable global occupational disease surveillance.