Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Speech-Sounds Perception Test: analysis of a randomized answer form

R A Charter1, R L Dutra

  • 1Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Long Beach, California 90822, USA.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|October 7, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Multicentric Brazilian Investigative Study of Copy Number Variations in Patients with Congenital Anomalies and Intellectual Disability.

Scientific reports·2018
Same author

A possible role of different PTPN genes in immune regulation.

Scandinavian journal of immunology·2012
Same author

Item difficulty of the tactual performance test location score.

Perceptual and motor skills·2002
Same author

Discrepancy scores of reliabilities of the WAIS-III.

Psychological reports·2002
Same author

"Damn the precision, full speed ahead with the clinical interpretation.".

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2002
Same author

Meaning of reliability in terms of correct and incorrect clinical decisions: the art of decision making is still alive.

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2002
Same journal

Theoretical and Psychological Mechanisms of Perceptual-Motor Learning in AI Bots-Assisted Art Education.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
See all related articles

The Speech-Sounds Perception Test

Area of Science:

  • Speech-language pathology
  • Psychometrics
  • Auditory perception research

Background:

  • The Speech-Sounds Perception Test (SSPT) is a tool used to assess auditory perception.
  • Standardized testing requires reliable and valid answer sheets.
  • Previous versions of the SSPT answer sheet may have had limitations in error type randomization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of subjects using two different answer sheet formats for the Speech-Sounds Perception Test.
  • To determine if a revised answer sheet format, with randomized error types, offers significant advantages over the standard form.
  • To evaluate the practical significance of any observed differences in test responses.

Main Methods:

  • Forty subjects participated in the study.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Responses were collected using both the standard and revised (randomized error types) answer sheets of the Speech-Sounds Perception Test.
  • Statistical analysis was performed to compare the responses between the two forms.

    • Main Results:

    • A statistically significant difference was found between the responses to the standard and revised answer sheets.
    • The practical difference between the two forms was negligible.
    • The randomization of error types in the revised answer sheet did not lead to a practically significant change in subject responses.

    Conclusions:

    • While statistically significant, the differences observed between the standard and revised Speech-Sounds Perception Test answer sheets are not practically meaningful.
    • The revised answer sheet format, despite randomizing error types, does not offer a substantial improvement in test response analysis over the standard form.
    • Further research may be needed to explore other potential revisions or alternative assessment methods for auditory perception.