Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Power-frequency fields and cancer

J E Moulder1

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226, USA.

Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
|October 8, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mitigating effect of EUK-207 on radiation-induced cognitive impairments.

Behavioural brain research·2016
Same author

Laminin 332 deposition is diminished in irradiated skin in an animal model of combined radiation and wound skin injury.

Radiation research·2011
Same author

Mitigation of radiation injuries via suppression of the renin-angiotensin system: emphasis on radiation nephropathy.

Current drug targets·2010
Same author

Propagation of giant migrating contractions between the small intestine, cecum and colon during radiation.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2010
Same author

Vascular injury after whole thoracic x-ray irradiation in the rat.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2009
Same author

Treatment of radiation nephropathy with ACE inhibitors and AII type-1 and type-2 receptor antagonists.

Current pharmaceutical design·2007
Same journal

The Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Critical reviews in biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Local-Global-Graph Network-Based Biokey Generation with Electrocardiogram Signal and Lightweight Authentication in Cloud-Based Internet of Medical Things Networks.

Critical reviews in biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Brain Injury Assessment: Methodological Foundations and Clinical Insights.

Critical reviews in biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Novel Investigation of Hepatitis B Transmission Dynamics via Fractal-Fractional Operators of Variable and Constant Order with Memory Effects.

Critical reviews in biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

An Improved YOLOv8-Based Object Detection Algorithm for Skin Diseases.

Critical reviews in biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

A Numerical Comparison of Magnetic Nanoparticle Hyperthermia in Breast, Muscle, and Prostate Tumors.

Critical reviews in biomedical engineering·2025
See all related articles

Concerns about cancer risks from electromagnetic fields (EMF) are widespread. However, scientific evidence, including epidemiological and laboratory studies, suggests that EMF exposure is unlikely to cause cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Public concern exists regarding potential cancer risks from exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF).
  • This concern is often linked to epidemiological studies suggesting an association between cancer and proximity to power lines.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the scientific evidence linking environmental electromagnetic field exposure to cancer.
  • To assess the plausibility of EMFs causing biological effects relevant to carcinogenesis.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewed epidemiological studies on EMF exposure and cancer incidence.
  • Examined biophysical principles to assess the plausibility of biological effects from environmental EMFs.
  • Analyzed laboratory studies investigating genotoxic and epigenetic activity of power-frequency fields.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Epidemiological evidence for a causal link between EMFs and cancer is weak and inconclusive.
  • Biophysical analysis suggests biological effects are implausible at environmental field strengths.
  • Approximately 100 laboratory studies show no replicated evidence of EMFs causing or contributing to cancer; studies showing effects often lack real-world relevance or replicability.

Conclusions:

  • The causal association between power-frequency fields and cancer is not only unproven but unlikely.
  • Current scientific evidence does not support a link between environmental EMF exposure and cancer risk.