Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Deaf culture, cochlear implants, and elective disability

The Hastings Center Report

|October 8, 1998

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Access to health care for individuals with hearing impairments.

Houston law review·2002

Same author

The U.S. Civil Rights Commission report, "Medical discrimination against children with disabilities": a brief commentary.

Issues in law & medicine·1990

Same journal

Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

The Hastings Center report·2026

Same journal

Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

The Hastings Center report·2026

Same journal

Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

The Hastings Center report·2026

Same journal

Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

The Hastings Center report·2026

Same journal

Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

The Hastings Center report·2026

Same journal

Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

The Hastings Center report·2026

See all related articles

Cochlear implants for prelingually deafened children spark debate, with Deaf culture advocates opposing them as invasive and a cultural threat. This raises questions about disability rights and societal support for those declining medical interventions.

Area of Science:

Bioethics
Disability Studies
Audiology

Background:

Cochlear implantation for prelingually deafened children is controversial.
Deaf culture proponents view implants as invasive, ineffective, and a threat to cultural identity.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the ethical debate surrounding cochlear implants for prelingually deafened children.
To examine the extent to which individuals with disabilities can refuse medical treatments.
To investigate societal obligations for support and accommodations when treatments are declined.

Main Methods:

Literature review of ethical arguments and cultural perspectives.
Analysis of legal and ethical frameworks regarding patient autonomy and disability rights.
Case study examination of societal responses to treatment refusal in disability contexts.

Keywords:

Americans with Disabilities Act 1990 National Association of the Deaf Professional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

The debate highlights a conflict between medical intervention goals and Deaf cultural values.
Individuals with disabilities possess rights to refuse medical treatments, including those aimed at ameliorating their condition.
Societal obligations for accommodation and support for those declining treatment remain a complex and debated issue.

Conclusions:

The ethical considerations of cochlear implants involve balancing potential benefits with cultural and individual rights.
Respecting the autonomy of individuals with disabilities to refuse treatment is paramount.
Further discourse is needed to define societal responsibilities in supporting diverse choices within the disability community.