Related Experiment Videos
Autonomy and assisted suicide. The execution of freedom
The Hastings Center Report
|October 8, 1998
Summary
Arguments for assisted suicide based on autonomy are flawed. Without a clear theory of the good, autonomy cannot differentiate permissible from prohibited acts, and imposing specific beliefs violates individual autonomy.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Moral Philosophy
Background:
- Arguments for assisted suicide often rely on the principle of autonomy.
- The concept of autonomy in ethical decision-making requires careful consideration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically examine the application of autonomy in arguments for assisted suicide.
- To explore the limitations of autonomy when a substantive theory of the good is absent.
Main Methods:
- Philosophical analysis of the concept of autonomy.
- Ethical reasoning regarding moral prohibitions and permissions.
- Examination of theories of the good and their relation to autonomy.
Main Results:
- Autonomy, in the absence of a substantive theory of the good, cannot distinguish morally permissible from prohibited acts.
- Imposing specific theories of the good, such as individual liberty or sanctity of life, infringes upon the autonomy of those who dissent.
Conclusions:
- The ethical justification of assisted suicide based solely on autonomy is philosophically inadequate.
- Respect for autonomy necessitates avoiding the imposition of contested theories of the good.