Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating the performance of fluorescence microscopes

Murray1

  • 1Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6058, U.S.A.

Journal of Microscopy
|October 10, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Pathology and Treatment of Cholera.

The Indian medical gazette·2017
Same author

The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors.

JAMA·2013
Same author

A Discussion on Sarcomata and Myelomata of the Long Bones.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine·2009
Same author

Effect of menatetrenone (vitamin K2) treatment on bone loss in patients with anorexia nervosa.

Psychiatry research·2003
Same author

Tandem nitroaldol-dehydration reactions employing the dianion of phenylsulfonylnitromethane(1)

The Journal of organic chemistry·2000
Same author

Analysis of Solid-Phase Reactions: Product Identification and Quantification by Use of UV-Chromophore-Containing Dual-Linker Analytical Constructs We thank Dr. P. Marshall for the provision of analytical data.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2000
Same journal

In operando imaging of the space-charge region in a 4H-SiC MOSCAP using STEM-EBIC.

Journal of microscopy·2026
Same journal

The future of DXA: How AI is transforming bone health diagnostics.

Journal of microscopy·2026
Same journal

The Origins of Ploem's Filter Cube: A Pandora's Box.

Journal of microscopy·2026
Same journal

The reproducibility gap in graph neural network workflows for cell dynamics: A checklist-driven case study.

Journal of microscopy·2026
Same journal

Assessing the reproducibility of a bioimage analysis workflow characterising tissue flow in Drosophila.

Journal of microscopy·2026
Same journal

Modular training resources for bioimage analysis.

Journal of microscopy·2026
See all related articles

A new fluorescence microscope test provides a single performance metric. This method uses photobleaching to assess image quality, offering a system-independent measure of microscope performance for better scientific imaging.

Area of Science:

  • Optical microscopy
  • Biophysics
  • Scientific instrumentation

Background:

  • Evaluating fluorescence microscope performance is crucial for reliable imaging.
  • Existing methods often assess individual parameters, lacking a holistic view.
  • Image quality is determined by multiple instrumental factors including light throughput, resolution, and noise.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a simple, comprehensive method for evaluating fluorescence microscope performance.
  • To establish an overall figure of merit integrating key instrumental parameters.
  • To provide a system-independent measure of microscope capabilities.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed test utilizes a specimen with a photobleaching rate.
  • Photobleaching rate serves as a proxy for the illumination time-intensity integral.

Related Experiment Videos

  • By controlling the time-intensity integral, signal-to-noise ratio of subresolution objects is measured.

    • Main Results:

    • The test yields a single figure of merit for overall microscope performance.
    • This metric accounts for light throughput, resolution, and intrinsic noise.
    • The signal-to-noise ratio becomes independent of specific system parameters when the time-intensity integral is controlled.

    Conclusions:

    • The described test offers a straightforward and effective way to evaluate fluorescence microscopes.
    • It provides a unified measure of image quality by considering critical instrumental factors.
    • This approach facilitates objective comparison and optimization of fluorescence microscopy systems.