Comparison of pathological diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer disease

Because the clinical picture of Alzheimer disease (AD) is often difficult to discriminate from other dementing illnesses, the diagnosis of AD requires neuropathological confirmation. However, for the pathological diagnosis of AD, there are no unanimously accepted criteria. The three currently used sets of pathological criteria (Khachaturian: Khachaturian, Arch Neurol 1985;42:1097-105; Tiemy: Tierney et al., Can J Neurol Sci 1986; 13:424-6; CERAD: Mirra et al., Neurology 1991;41:479-86) for the disease differ from each other considerably. We applied these criteria to the first 43 consecutive subjects (37 demented) with no neuropathology other than AD-type pathology from autopsies after longitudinal prospective clinical study in the Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Ageing (OPTIMA). The results show that the CERAD category of definite AD corresponds closely with the cases that fulfill Tierney A3 inclusion criteria for AD. The combined CERAD categories of possible, probable, and definite AD correspond closely to cases fulfilling Khachaturian criteria forAD. The influence of a clinical diagnosis of dementia when Khachaturian and CERAD criteria were applied was considerable because between 9.3% and 90.7% of patients would have been categorized differently depending on whether clinical dementia was present or absent.