Related Experiment Videos
Misclassification rates for current smokers misclassified as nonsmokers
A J Wells1, P B English, S F Posner
1Impact Assessment, Inc, California Department of Health Services, Environmental Health Investigations Branch, Emeryville, USA.
American Journal of Public Health
|October 17, 1998
Summary
Current smokers misreporting as nonsmokers have low misclassification rates, particularly women. This finding is crucial for accurate passive smoking research and understanding bias in lung cancer studies.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Epidemiology
- Toxicology
Background:
- Accurate assessment of smoking status is critical in epidemiological studies, especially those investigating passive smoking and lung cancer.
- Smoker misclassification bias can significantly impact the estimation of relative risks in such studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine misclassification rates of current cigarette smokers who self-report as nonsmokers.
- To provide data that can help correct for smoker misclassification bias in passive smoking research.
Main Methods:
- Utilized cotinine levels in body fluids to verify true smoking status (occasional or regular) in current smokers from three existing studies.
- Integrated new data with existing data from the 1992 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) report on passive smoking.
- Stratified misclassification rates by sex and US minority/majority status.
Main Results:
- Reported specific misclassification rates for female smokers misclassified as never smokers across different categories (majority/minority, regular/occasional).
- Rates for females were 0.8% (majority regular), 6.0% (majority occasional), 2.8% (US minority regular), and 15.3% (US minority occasional).
- Observed generally higher misclassification rates for males compared to females.
Conclusions:
- Supported the EPA's conclusion that smoker misclassification bias is generally small.
- Recommended that researchers consider the minority/majority status of study cohorts when adjusting for smoker misclassification bias.