Related Experiment Videos
Infections from extended epidural catheterization in ambulatory patients
1Health Destinations, The Institute for the Study of Treatment of Arachnoiditis, Santa Rosa Beach, Florida 32459, USA.
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
|October 17, 1998
Summary
Prolonged home epidural analgesia for severe pain is feasible with a low infection rate. Intermittent prophylactic antibiotics may further reduce infection risk in these patients.
Area of Science:
- Pain Management
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
Background:
- Severe and noncancer pain management often requires prolonged analgesia.
- Home-based epidural infusions offer an alternative to inpatient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence of infection in patients receiving prolonged home epidural infusions of analgesics.
- To evaluate the potential benefit of prophylactic antibiotics in reducing infection rates.
Main Methods:
- A study involving 504 adult patients receiving intermittent epidural infusions (bupivacaine and fentanyl) for 2-80 days at home.
- Infection diagnosis based on clinical signs (fever, pain, leukocytosis) and imaging (CT, epidurogram, sonogram).
- Comparison of infection rates between patients receiving and not receiving prophylactic antibiotics (penicillin or erythromycin).
Main Results:
- A low overall infection rate of 0.27% (9 out of 3,164 infusions) was observed.
- Infections included epidural abscesses, fascitis, and cellulitis, predominantly caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis.
- Prophylactic antibiotic use was associated with a reduced infection rate (0.11% vs. 0.4%).
Conclusions:
- Home epidural analgesia for up to 80 days is a viable option for severe pain with a low risk of infection.
- Intermittent prophylactic antibiotics appear to further decrease infection incidence.
- Findings may not be generalizable to epidural infusions exceeding 80 days.