Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On the temporal relations between memory scanning and response preparation

A B Ilan1, J Miller

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, USA. aaron@eeg.com

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|October 21, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neurophysiological and subjective profile of marijuana with varying concentrations of cannabinoids.

Behavioural pharmacology·2005
Same author

Prolonged neurophysiological effects of cumulative wine drinking.

Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)·2002
Same author

Tobacco smoking and event-related brain potentials in a Stroop task.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2001
Same author

Tobacco smoking and memory scanning: behavioral and event-related potential effects.

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco·2000
Same author

P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·1999
Same author

A distinction between the initiation and the continuation of response preparation.

Psychophysiology·1999

Cognitive tasks requiring both memory scanning and response preparation do not allow concurrent processing. Interference between these processes prevents response preparation from beginning until memory scanning is complete.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Information Processing

Background:

  • Investigating the temporal dynamics of cognitive processes is crucial for understanding human performance.
  • The interplay between memory retrieval and response execution is a key area in cognitive psychology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if response preparation can initiate before memory scanning is fully completed.
  • To examine the interference between memory scanning and response preparation in cognitive tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using behavioral and electrophysiological measures.
  • Experiment 1 used stimulus color to determine response hand and memory set membership for response execution/withholding.
  • Experiment 3 employed a probe reaction time paradigm to assess early response priming.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Electrophysiological data indicated that response preparation was delayed until memory scanning concluded.
  • Results suggested that stimulus color could prime a response before memory scanning finished.
  • Behavioral data supported the notion of interference between concurrent memory and response processes.

Conclusions:

  • Memory scanning and response preparation are sequential rather than parallel processes.
  • Interference effects preclude the simultaneous operation of memory scanning and response preparation.
  • Cognitive task design must account for the sequential nature of these processes to optimize performance.