Young children's predictions of illness: failure to recognize probabilistic causation

Related Experiment Videos

C W Kalish1

  • 1University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, USA. cwkalish@facstaff.wisc.edu

Developmental Psychology
|October 21, 1998
PubMed

Insights

Preschoolers often view illness causes as definite, not probabilistic, unlike adults. They struggle to grasp uncertainty in illness outcomes, except when voluntary choices are involved.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Development
  • Causal Reasoning
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Understanding how children perceive causality is crucial for developmental psychology.
  • Preschoolers' ability to distinguish between definite and probabilistic causes, especially for familiar concepts like illness, is not well-established.
  • Previous research suggests children's causal understanding evolves with age, but specific nuances for probabilistic events require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether preschool-age children perceive familiar causes of illness as definite or probabilistic.
  • To compare children's predictions of illness outcomes with adult judgments.
  • To explore children's understanding of uncertainty in relation to different types of causes.

Main Methods:

  • Preschool-aged children participated in three experiments involving predictions about salient probabilistic causes.
  • Experiment 1 assessed judgments about common causes affecting groups.
  • Experiment 2 examined predictions for single-case illness outcomes.
  • Experiment 3 involved causes of varying potency (high and low).

Main Results:

  • Children in Experiments 1 and 2 treated illness causes as definite, expecting uniform outcomes for groups and predictable outcomes for individuals.
  • These child judgments contrasted with adults' typically variable and uncertain predictions.
  • Children did, however, recognize uncertainty in outcomes linked to voluntary choices.
  • In Experiment 3, children consistently treated both high- and low-potency illness causes as nonprobabilistic.

Conclusions:

  • Preschool children's understanding of causal relations often treats familiar causes, particularly for illness, as definite rather than probabilistic.
  • This suggests a developmental gap in grasping uncertainty, except in contexts involving volitional action.
  • The findings highlight the need to consider children's developing causal models and their interpretation of variability in event outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
Preoperational Thought II: Object Space and Causality01:29

Preoperational Thought II: Object Space and Causality

Jean Piaget’s preoperational stage, spanning ages 2 to 7, is marked by symbolic thought and the development of spatial and causal reasoning. Although Piaget emphasized the limitations of children’s logic, later research suggests that preschoolers may reason more effectively than he initially proposed.Developing Spatial UnderstandingAround age 3, children begin understanding that two-dimensional images and models can represent real spaces. This allows them to interpret pictures, maps, and scale...
Factors Affecting Illness01:18

Factors Affecting Illness

When a person's physical, emotional, intellectual, social development or spiritual functioning is compromised, this deviation from a healthy normal state is called illness. Illness creates stress that in turn harms individuals. Irritation, anger, denial, hopelessness, and fear are behavioral and emotional changes an individual experiences in the phases of illness. A variety of factors influence a person's health and well-being.
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts: