Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Practical evaluation of comparative modelling and threading methods

M J Schoonman1, R M Knegtel, P D Grootenhuis

  • 1Department of Molecular Design & Informatics, N.V. Organon, Oss, The Netherlands.

Computers & Chemistry
|October 27, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fucosyltransferases: structure/function studies.

Glycobiology·2001
Same author

Neighboring cysteine residues in human fucosyltransferase VII are engaged in disulfide bridges, forming small loop structures.

Glycobiology·2001
Same author

Applications of random sampling to virtual screening of combinatorial libraries.

Journal of molecular graphics & modelling·2001
Same author

Similarity-driven flexible ligand docking.

Proteins·2000
Same author

A rapid computational method for lead evolution: description and application to alpha(1)-adrenergic antagonists.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2000
Same author

Sequence annotation of nuclear receptor ligand-binding domains by automated homology modeling.

Protein engineering·2000
Same journal

Constructing a useful tool for characterizing amino acid conformers by means of quantum chemical and graph theory indices.

Computers & chemistry·2002
Same journal

CLiBE: a database of computed ligand binding energy for ligand-receptor complexes.

Computers & chemistry·2002
Same journal

On the solution of mixed-integer nonlinear programming models for computer aided molecular design.

Computers & chemistry·2002
Same journal

Use of the Numerov method to improve the accuracy of the spatial discretisation in finite-difference electrochemical kinetic simulations.

Computers & chemistry·2002
Same journal

Automatic identification by 13C NMR of substituent groups bonded in natural product skeletons.

Computers & chemistry·2002
Same journal

A new redundant variable pruning approach--minor latent variable perturbation-PLS used for QSAR studies on anti-HIV drugs.

Computers & chemistry·2002
See all related articles

Protein structure prediction tools were evaluated. Threading methods outperform comparative modeling for low sequence identity, but a gap remains. Including ligands improves active site accuracy in models.

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Structural Bioinformatics
  • Protein Modeling

Background:

  • Accurate protein structure prediction is crucial for understanding biological function.
  • Evaluating the performance of different computational methods is essential for advancing the field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the accuracy of various protein structure prediction tools.
  • To compare threading and comparative modeling approaches.
  • To investigate the impact of ligands on active site model accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized six protein pairs with known 3D structures.
  • Generated sequence alignments using QUANTA, THREADER, 123D, and PHD Topits.
  • Built protein structure models with MODELLER.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed model accuracy using root mean square deviation (RMSD) and 3D profile scores.
  • Main Results:

    • Threading methods yielded more accurate models than comparative modeling for sequence identities below 30%.
    • A persistent 2 Å RMSD gap exists between theoretical best models and those from threading.
    • Comparative modeling with MODELLER produced accurate models for high sequence identities (>30%).
    • The 3D profile score was not consistently reliable in distinguishing correct folds.
    • Including ligands during model building prevented unrealistic active site filling.

    Conclusions:

    • Threading is superior for low sequence identity protein structure prediction.
    • Comparative modeling is effective for high sequence identity cases.
    • Ligand inclusion is vital for accurate active site modeling.