Related Experiment Videos
A comparison of temperature-taking methods in neonates
1Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO 64108-9898, USA.
Neonatal Network : NN
|October 29, 1998
Summary
The B-D Digital Fever thermometer most accurately measured infant axillary temperature compared to glass/mercury thermometers. Other devices like Tempa.DOT and CORE.CHECK showed varying correlations, with skin and tympanic temperatures affected by external factors.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal care
- Medical device technology
- Clinical thermometry
Background:
- Accurate infant temperature monitoring is crucial for clinical decision-making.
- Various non-invasive thermometers are available, but their accuracy in neonates requires validation.
- Environmental and developmental factors can influence temperature readings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare temperature measurements from multiple thermometers against a reference glass/mercury thermometer in infants.
- To evaluate the impact of environmental, developmental, and pharmacological factors on thermometer accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Descriptive study design.
- Convenience sample of 220 infants (birth weight >= 1,500 gm).
- Comparison of axillary, skin, and tympanic measurements from digital, single-use, and tympanic thermometers against axillary glass/mercury reference.
Main Results:
- The B-D Digital Fever thermometer demonstrated the highest correlation for axillary temperature.
- Tempa.DOT single-use thermometers showed the second-highest correlation.
- Tympanic measurements (CORE.CHECK) had moderate correlation; skin temperatures were affected by nesting, clothing, and probe placement.
Conclusions:
- Digital thermometers offer a viable alternative for accurate axillary infant temperature measurement.
- Factors like swaddling, clothing, and bed type can significantly impact non-axillary temperature readings.
- Further research may be needed to refine non-invasive thermometry in diverse neonatal conditions.