Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with six luting agents: an in vitro study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2026
Standardized Protocol to Evaluate the Effect of Surface Treatments, Luting Cements, and Thermocycling on PEEK–Composite Bond Strength
Published on: June 9, 2026
1Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, USA.
Purpose:
This in vitro study compared the effectiveness of 6 luting systems on the retention of prefabricated titanium posts.
Material And Methods:
A total of 120 single-rooted teeth were sectioned at the cementoenamel junction and treated endodontically. Roots were mounted in copper cylinders, and prefabricated, parallel-sided titanium posts were cemented according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two resin-ionomer hybrid cements and 2 resin cements were tested with corresponding dentin bonding agents. A glass ionomer cement was also tested, and zinc-phosphate cement served as the control. Samples were tested in an Instron universal testing machine to catastrophic tensile failure.
Results:
Advance cement with Prime and Bond systems was found to be statistically more retentive than all other groups tested (P < .05). Cement It with Bond It and Permalute with Permalute Primers A and B systems demonstrated significantly greater retention than Ketac Cem cement, Resinomer with One-Step system and zinc-phosphate cement (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference among Ketac Cem cement, Resinomer with One-Step system, and zinc-phosphate cement.