Related Experiment Videos

Proliferation indices as molecular pharmacodynamic endpoints in evaluation of anticancer drug effect in human solid

J R Weaver1, Y Gan, J L Au

  • 1College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.

Pharmaceutical Research
|October 30, 1998
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation is a reliable method for evaluating anticancer drug effects in solid tumors. This DNA precursor labeling method is interchangeable with thymidine (TdR) and more consistent than proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Evaluating anticancer drug efficacy requires reliable pharmacodynamic endpoints.
  • Proliferative indices, including DNA precursor incorporation and PCNA expression, are used to assess drug effects.
  • Human solid tumor models are crucial for preclinical drug evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare DNA precursor incorporation (thymidine/TdR and bromodeoxyuridine/BrdU) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression as molecular pharmacodynamic endpoints.
  • To evaluate the effect of anticancer drugs (doxorubicin, mitomycin C, paclitaxel) on these proliferative indices in human solid tumors.
  • To determine the reliability and interchangeability of different methods for assessing antiproliferative activity.

Main Methods:

  • Human solid tumor specimens were cultured and treated with anticancer drugs.
  • DNA precursor incorporation was measured using [3H]TdR (autoradiography) and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) (immunohistochemistry).
  • Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression was assessed using immunohistochemical techniques.

Main Results:

  • Thymidine (TdR) and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling yielded identical pharmacodynamic results, indicating interchangeability.
  • Pharmacodynamics derived from DNA precursor incorporation differed from those derived from PCNA expression.
  • PCNA expression showed erratic inhibition in some tumors, suggesting potential unreliability.
  • Drug-specific differences in pharmacodynamics were observed, with paclitaxel showing greater divergence than mitomycin C.

Conclusions:

  • Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation is a reliable and interchangeable alternative to thymidine (TdR) for assessing antiproliferative activity.
  • The DNA precursor labeling method is more reliable than PCNA expression due to erratic results with the latter.
  • Inhibition of BrdU incorporation is a valuable endpoint for evaluating anticancer drug efficacy in human solid tumors, offering advantages in speed and avoidance of radioactivity.

Related Concept Videos